By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Criminal Injustice and DNA Testing
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Medical Ethics > Criminal Injustice and DNA Testing
Medical Ethics

Criminal Injustice and DNA Testing

JohnCGoodman
JohnCGoodman
Share
2 Min Read
SHARE

Since the late 1980s, DNA testing has exonerated more than 250 wrongly convicted people, who spent an average of 13 years in prison for crimes they didn’t commit.

How did that happen?

Since the late 1980s, DNA testing has exonerated more than 250 wrongly convicted people, who spent an average of 13 years in prison for crimes they didn’t commit.

How did that happen?

More Read

Feds Bust Doctor for Medicare Fraud– Biggest MD Fraud Case in History
Corporate Social Responsibility in Healthcare
Population Health – The Work Has Just Begun
HIPAA Basics For Licensed Health Care Professionals: Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules
CEO Indicted For Luring Foreign Nurses to the US for Fake Jobs
  • 40 of them actually confessed to crimes they didn’t commit, most adding specific details that only the real culprit could have known [because] police browbeat them into false confessions.
  • Eyewitnesses wrongly identified the accused in 76 percent of the 250 cases [often because] police contaminated the eyewitness identifications with suggestive methods, like indicating which suspect in a lineup should be selected, or conducting lineups where one suspect obviously stood out from the others.
  • In 61 percent of the trials where an analyst testified for the prosecution, including overly confident claims of matching bite marks, shoe prints and hair samples.
  • In 21 percent of the trials — informers … in exchange for lenient treatment from prosecutors, lied about hearing specific details of the crime from their cell mates.

Full NYT review of Brandon L. Garrett’s book: Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong.

   

TAGGED:DNA testinglaw
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Remote Monitoring touchpoints
Remote Monitoring Touchpoints Patients Will Actually Follow
Technology
October 9, 2025
dental care
Importance of Good Dental Care for Health and Confidence
Dental health Specialties
October 2, 2025
AI in Healthcare
AI in Healthcare: Technology is Transforming the Global Landscape
Global Healthcare Policy & Law Technology
October 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Swimwear for Health and Safety
News
September 30, 2025

You Might also Like

Junk in the Trunk: Amateur Buttock Enhancements can Kill

November 21, 2011
biopharma beat
BusinessFinanceHealth ReformMedical EthicsMedical InnovationsPublic Health

BioPharma Beat: We Want Healthcare at Any Price – Until We Have It

May 7, 2014
debunking-myths-myth2_1.png
DiagnosticseHealthMedical Ethics

Debunking Digital Patient Recruitment Myths for Clinical Trials: Myth #2

April 7, 2016
medical practice and health tech
Medical EducationMedical EthicsPolicy & LawTechnology

Mapping the Role of Health Tech in Medical Practice

November 3, 2021
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?