By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Criminal Injustice and DNA Testing
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Medical Ethics > Criminal Injustice and DNA Testing
Medical Ethics

Criminal Injustice and DNA Testing

JohnCGoodman
JohnCGoodman
Share
2 Min Read
SHARE

Since the late 1980s, DNA testing has exonerated more than 250 wrongly convicted people, who spent an average of 13 years in prison for crimes they didn’t commit.

How did that happen?

Since the late 1980s, DNA testing has exonerated more than 250 wrongly convicted people, who spent an average of 13 years in prison for crimes they didn’t commit.

How did that happen?

More Read

Ripping Off Medicare
Collaborating with Patients in the Digital Information Age
Study Finds Nursing Homes Have Inadequate Care and Discharge Planning
Have Physicians Lost Their MoJo?
Plan B’s Balancing Act
  • 40 of them actually confessed to crimes they didn’t commit, most adding specific details that only the real culprit could have known [because] police browbeat them into false confessions.
  • Eyewitnesses wrongly identified the accused in 76 percent of the 250 cases [often because] police contaminated the eyewitness identifications with suggestive methods, like indicating which suspect in a lineup should be selected, or conducting lineups where one suspect obviously stood out from the others.
  • In 61 percent of the trials where an analyst testified for the prosecution, including overly confident claims of matching bite marks, shoe prints and hair samples.
  • In 21 percent of the trials — informers … in exchange for lenient treatment from prosecutors, lied about hearing specific details of the crime from their cell mates.

Full NYT review of Brandon L. Garrett’s book: Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong.

   

TAGGED:DNA testinglaw
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

a woman walking on the hallway
6 Easy Healthcare Ways to Sit Less and Move More Every Day
Health
September 9, 2025
Clinical Expertise
Healthcare at a Crossroads: Why Leadership Matters More Than Ever
Global Healthcare
September 9, 2025
travel nurse in north carolina
Balancing Speed and Scope: Choosing the Nursing Degree That Fits Your Goals
Nursing
September 1, 2025
intimacy
How to Keep Intimacy Comfortable as You Age
Relationship and Lifestyle Senior Care
September 1, 2025

You Might also Like

CEO Indicted For Luring Foreign Nurses to the US for Fake Jobs

March 12, 2012

A Theory on Why The FDA Hid Conflicts of Interest

January 15, 2012

When Is External Peer Review The Right Choice For Hospitals?

October 20, 2015
protect patient's information
Health ReformMedical EthicsPolicy & Law

7 Key Tips To Protecting Patient Health Information

September 8, 2022
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?