We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: An Oxygen Tax
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Public Health > An Oxygen Tax
Public Health

An Oxygen Tax

JasonShafrin
JasonShafrin
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

The UK explored selling or leasing forest land to private interests, but encounter some public backlash. “The plans were intended to give the private sector, community and charitable groups greater involvement in woodlands by encouraging a “mixed model” of ownership. But critics argued it could threaten public access, biodiversity and result in forests being used for unsuitable purposes.” Should the government own forests? In general, I would say no. If private firms or organizations would want to pay to access these forests, they should be able to do so. Some of the businesses who buy the land may want to harvest trees or start building apartment buildings. Others may want to create eco-tourism sites or private NGOs could buy the land to maintain it in its natural state. Regardless, individuals, firms, or organizations with the highest willingness to pay should be able to purchase the property. Once exception may be the production of oxygen. Trees produce oxygen for the whole country. However, oxygen is generally non-excludable. Thus, by cutting down trees, businesses who decide to deforest land impose an externality on others, especially if there are few forests left. To solve this problem, the government would create an oxygen tax. The tax would basically mandate that you need to have a certain number of trees per acre on your land or else you would pay the tax. This could apply to all land, not just forests. With the cost of apartments in central London, it is of course optimal to simply pay the tax and create dense neighborhoods. The oxygen tax is not without its flaws. If the tax is based on the number of trees on the property, one could simply buy lots of young trees to avoid the tax. Young, smaller trees, however, will not produce as much oxygen as larger older trees. One could estimate the aggregate biomass of trees on any property, but this would of course require regulators to ensure that people don’t lie about the biomass on their property. Is the oxygen tax a good idea? If deforestation becomes severe enough, it may be.

TAGGED:public health
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Biofeedback Technology in Addiction Treatment: What the Evidence Shows So Far -- AI-generated illustration
Biofeedback Technology in Addiction Treatment: What the Evidence Shows So Far
Addiction Addiction Recovery
September 28, 2026
Charity Care Is Written Into Hospital Policy. It Rarely Makes It Onto the Bill. -- AI-generated illustration
Charity Care Is Written Into Hospital Policy. It Rarely Makes It Onto the Bill.
Business Hospital Administration
September 25, 2026
A Global Perspective on Medicine: Lessons Learned Across Borders -- AI-generated illustration
A Global Perspective on Medicine: Lessons Learned Across Borders
Medicines
September 23, 2026
KMG Psychiatry Discusses the Role of Self-Awareness in Mental Health  -- AI-generated illustration
KMG Psychiatry Discusses the Role of Self-Awareness in Mental Health 
Mental Health
September 23, 2026

You Might also Like

Employers Get Tough

March 15, 2012
Does more insurance mean longer lines?
Health ReformHospital AdministrationPolicy & LawPublic Health

Expanding Insurance May Not Mean Long Lines and Trouble Seeing the Doctor

September 26, 2014

Who talks more? The Doctor or the Patient?: Infographic

March 15, 2012
NewsPublic Health

Is Sugar Carcinogenic?

May 1, 2012
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?