We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Breaking News: HHS Proposes 1 Year Delay to ICD-10
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Uncategorized > Breaking News: HHS Proposes 1 Year Delay to ICD-10
Uncategorized

Breaking News: HHS Proposes 1 Year Delay to ICD-10

Fred Pennic
Fred Pennic
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

 

After patiently waiting, The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today announced a proposed rule that would delay ICD-10 from October 1, 2013 to October 1, 2014, the compliance date for the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition diagnosis and procedure codes (ICD-10).

 

After patiently waiting, The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today announced a proposed rule that would delay ICD-10 from October 1, 2013 to October 1, 2014, the compliance date for the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition diagnosis and procedure codes (ICD-10).

More Read

8 funny icd10 codes his
Eight of the Funniest ICD-10 Codes
6 Important Tips to Ensure Smooth Clinical Trial Logistics
NIST Recommendations for Security in the Outsourced Cloud
Essential Steps to Take to Recover from a Slip and Fall Injury
Wellness Focus: How to Stay Motivated When Working from Home

The ICD-10 compliance date change is part of a proposed rule that would adopt a standard for a unique health plan identifier (HPID), adopt a data element that would serve as an “other entity” identifier (OEID), and add a National Provider Identifier (NPI) requirement. The proposed rule was developed by the Office of E-Health Standards and Services (OESS) as part of its ongoing role, delegated by HHS, to establish adopt standards for electronic health care transactions under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). OESS is part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

It has been reported that during the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) of the proposed rule, the HHS determined a cost avoidance of 3.6 billion and 8 billion dollars stating that the 1 year delay would add an additional 10 to 30 percent  to the total cost that healthcare entities have already spent or budgeted for the transition.

The 1 year delay is what many experts were projecting believing that the 1 year delay will allow those who have already started more time to prepare and optimize their ICD-10 readiness. For those that have not started working on preparations for ICD-10 now will now need to start in their planning efforts for ICD-10. Some of these tasks include:

  • Establishing an ICD-10 Steering Committee
  • Conducting an ICD-10 assessment to assess readiness
  • Establishing a ICD-10 Governance Model
  • Assigning an ICD-10 Project Manager (Internal or External)
  • Establishing ICD-10 Workgroups that will address areas impacted by ICD-10 such as revenue cycle, CDI, coding, etc.
  • Consider utilizing Computer Assisted Coding Solutions
  • Assigning an ICD-10 Training Partner
  • Seeking Contract  Coders to eliminate backlog
With the announcement, vendors who were no longer responding to healthcare providers regarding their ICD-10 readiness can no longer use the delay as a crutch. Vendors must continue preparing, respond, and ensure that their software will be ICD-10 compliant ideally 8 to 12 months prior to 10/2014 so that hospitals can accurately perform testings.
What are your thoughts on the ICD-10 delay? Should the date be pushed back only 6 months or even longer than a year?
Click here to view/download the  198-page proposed rule (PDF) that covers the suggested ICD-10 deadline change.

Click here to view the CMS fact sheet

TAGGED:HHSICD-10
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: The article's core relationship is that substantial clinical testing of thymosin alpha-1 did not est
Thymosin Alpha-1 Got the Big Trials Most Peptides Never Get
Global Healthcare
October 12, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The article examines how researchers study tissue repair through growth factors and peptide-based re
How Researchers Study Tissue Repair: From Growth Factors to Peptide-Based Research
Health
October 12, 2026
Workers Comp Claim Denied – Now What?  -- AI-generated illustration
Workers Comp Claim Denied – Now What? 
Policy & Law
October 9, 2026
The Case for Proactive Nutrient Support and Where IV Therapy Fits In -- AI-generated illustration
The Case for Proactive Nutrient Support and Where IV Therapy Fits In
Health Therapies
October 5, 2026

You Might also Like

ready for icd-10? HIS
BusinesseHealthFinanceHospital AdministrationMedical Records

Are Your Vendors Ready for ICD-10?

March 8, 2014

Do’s and Dont’s of Telemedicine

January 17, 2012

Specialty Article: HIT: Incentives May Not Always Serve Intended Purpose

October 17, 2011
eHealthMedical RecordsUncategorized

How HIPAA Applies to Medical Marijuana Businesses and Patients

July 8, 2020
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?