EMTALA: History Repeats Itself

April 15, 2011
49 Views

Hard to believe it’s been 25 years. In the spring of 1986, I was still pondering my top two career choices: medicine and civil engineering, anxiously awaiting an eventual scholarship to my undergraduate institution, and just simply trying to make the most of waning days of carefree bliss as a senior high school student.

Hard to believe it’s been 25 years. In the spring of 1986, I was still pondering my top two career choices: medicine and civil engineering, anxiously awaiting an eventual scholarship to my undergraduate institution, and just simply trying to make the most of waning days of carefree bliss as a senior high school student.

All the while, there were changes afoot in healthcare — changes that would eventually affect me and my chosen career path. It all had to do with the way the healthcare system was treating its poorest patients, fundamentally shifting policies that are really taken for granted today in the grand scheme of 21st century reform.

 

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) was passed as part of a larger bill — the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act — that year. It was a non-discrimination statute designed to guarantee patient stabilization in emergency medical cases regardless of the patient’s ability to pay and to prevent involuntary patient transfers for financial concerns and not via medical protocols (patient dumping). Little did Congress know at the time, that this law placed the onus of care coordination in emergent situations on hospitals — which had no choice but to develop policies that would have to contain costs for such guaranteed care.

Because of this legislation, healthcare providers had a responsibility to provide for the system’s sickest patients. States had no choice but to formulate solutions to a growing crisis in care delivery. EMTALA legislation set the stage for major changes in Medicare and Medicaid policy — not to mention exposing massive pitfalls in medicolegal scenarios paving the way for future discussions on tort reform as it applied to controlling healthcare costs in individual states.

There is no doubt that the core principles behind EMTALA provide a framework for the president’s initiatives on healthcare delivery — that all citizens are guaranteed care regardless of the ability to pay. The challenge for proponents of reform and the ACA in its entirety is to build upon that notion while supporting business models that guarantee supply of such care –something much easier said than done at this point in the timeline of U.S. healthcare policy.

Related posts:

  1. Tuesday Newswire: MN Nurses Overwhelmingly Approve Move to Strike & More It’s on. The mega union only needed 66%. They got…
  2. Minnesota’s Largest Acute Care Safety Net Announces Cuts in Care Delivery So much of what happens to safety-net healthcare delivery really…
  3. Analysis: Fewer Part D Plans in 2011, but Enhanced Choice for Beneficiaries At the Kaiser Foundation site, there’s a pretty decent analysis…

 

You may be interested

Where Is The Balance? Pushing Back Against Consumer Health Tech
eHealth
3 views
eHealth
3 views

Where Is The Balance? Pushing Back Against Consumer Health Tech

Larry Alton - August 18, 2017

When Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz glibly remarked that Americans struggling to afford insurance should choose between that and their smartphones,…

What to Look for in Patient Solutions Software
eHealth
365 views
eHealth
365 views

What to Look for in Patient Solutions Software

Robert Cordray - August 17, 2017

The medical sector is one area where technology has had a significant impact, largely by providing tools that simplify many…

Can Natural Remedies Like RediCalm Decrease Stress and Anxiety?
Wellness
2 views
Wellness
2 views

Can Natural Remedies Like RediCalm Decrease Stress and Anxiety?

Ryan Kh - August 16, 2017

According to research from the National Institute of Mental Health, anxiety disorders are the most common mental illness in the…