By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    HIPPA compliance
    How Medical Office Staff Can Make Your Practice HIPAA Compliant
    October 29, 2021
    Everything you need to know about hyaluronic acid treatment
    Everything you need to know about hyaluronic acid treatment
    February 10, 2022
    Which Mushroom Capsules Are Good for Your Health?
    May 5, 2022
    Latest News
    Why Custom Telemedicine Apps Outperform Off‑the‑Shelf Solutions
    July 20, 2025
    How Probate Planning Shapes the Future of Your Estate and Family Care
    July 17, 2025
    Beyond Nutrition: Everyday Foods That Support Whole-Body Health
    June 15, 2025
    The Wide-Ranging Benefits of Magnesium Supplements
    June 11, 2025
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Image
    Healthcare Pricing Transparency Gains Momentum
    June 24, 2013
    non-clinical care factors in health outcomes
    Addressing Non-Clinical Care Factors in Health Outcomes
    November 15, 2013
    e interventions
    Healthcare Progress Depends On “E Interventions”
    July 10, 2014
    Latest News
    How IT and Marketing Teams Can Collaborate to Protect Patient Trust
    July 17, 2025
    How Health Choices and Legal Actions Intersect After an Injury
    July 17, 2025
    How communities and healthcare providers can address slip and fall injuries with legal awareness
    July 17, 2025
    Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
    July 6, 2025
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Fee-for-Service Again
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > Finance > Fee-for-Service Again
BusinessFinanceHospital AdministrationPolicy & Law

Fee-for-Service Again

Greg Scandlen
Greg Scandlen
Share
5 Min Read
Fee-for-service care
SHARE

Fee-for-service careUSA Today asked me to write a counterpoint to their editorial calling for the abolition of Fee-For-Service payment in health care.

Fee-for-service careUSA Today asked me to write a counterpoint to their editorial calling for the abolition of Fee-For-Service payment in health care. Their editorial is here, and my counter is here.

Unfortunately, USA Today did not show me the article I was responding to. Now that I have read it, I want to make a few other observations.

First, the paper thinks that putting physicians on salary would curb the problem of overtreatment. Yes, it might do that, and replace one problem with another — under treatment. Physicians might become clock-watchers, punching in at 9:00 and out at 5:00, regardless of patient need. While on the clock, they might slow-walk their services. After all, why hurry when you get the same pay regardless of how much work you do? Even factories have long figured this one out, preferring to pay piecework instead of flat wages.

More Read

Is Fee-For-Service the Problem?
U.S. Tax Code Is One of World’s Most Progressive
How to Get Prescriptions Online Reliably and Cost-Effectively
Lawsuit Filed Against Quest Diagnostics for Overcharging
Death Is Women’s Work

But USA Today sees a more insidious problem in health care. It believes some physicians are “greedy, incompetent, and crooked.” No doubt that is true. I expect some newspaper editors are also “greedy, incompetent, and crooked.” Does placing doctors on salary solve that problem? No, it would actually worsen it for at least a couple of reasons. First, the physician would no longer be responsible for securing and paying for his own malpractice insurance. He would be covered by an enterprise-wide policy that minimizes his own culpability. Second, greedy, incompetent and crooked employees are very good at hiding in a big bureaucracy. They can always find someone else to blame for their own misdeeds and be shielded by workplace rules. Have you noticed how hard it has been to fire Lois Lerner from the IRS?

The paper says, “Ideally, doctors do no more than a patient needs.” Well, yes. But it is often hard to tell in advance what is “more than a patient needs,” and if doing “no more than needed” is the imperative, we might often end up doing less than the patient needs, with tragic consequences. If we place a ceiling on what the doctor does, if we punish him for doing more, he may err on the side of caution and often do less.

The paper also wants us to “encourage second opinions.” Good grief. Getting second opinions has been touted as a panacea for at least the last 30 years. Most of the research I have seen says that the second opinion almost always confirms the first opinion, but adds to costs because the second opinion is not cheap. That does not mean second opinions shouldn’t be done. Individual patients will be comforted if the first is confirmed or may change her mind if it is counter to the first. But there is no guarantee that the second opinion will be more valid than the first, and if the two conflict it may be necessary to get a third.

Finally, the paper says something I can agree with –

…[O]ne of the most effective ways to cut down on unnecessary operations is for doctors to share the decision-making with their patients by pointing out alternatives…

Yes, indeed. But it helps if the patient is holding the checkbook during that conversation. That is the only equalizer the patient has when negotiating with the doctor. The doctor can explain the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative, and what the costs will be! And the patient can then make a fully-informed decision. But that implies something USA Today has been railing against — a system in which fees reflect the services provided.  Otherwise, in a salaried system, the doctor will be advocating for the easiest, cheapest alternative and the patient will be suspicious of the recommendation and push for the most complicated and costly choice.

There is simply no substitute for a fee-for-service system in which the patient pays.

(Fee-for-service care / shutterstock)

TAGGED:fee for service
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

botox certification
Help Improve People’s Skin Health Via Botox Certification
Skin Specialties
July 22, 2025
Telemedicine Apps
Why Custom Telemedicine Apps Outperform Off‑the‑Shelf Solutions
Health
July 20, 2025
Grounded Healing: A Natural Ally for Sustainable Healthcare Systems
How IT and Marketing Teams Can Collaborate to Protect Patient Trust
Global Healthcare Policy & Law
July 17, 2025
paramedics in surgical gloves and masks
How Health Choices and Legal Actions Intersect After an Injury
Health care
July 16, 2025

You Might also Like

Worried About Teen Births? Read Our Paper

May 11, 2012
future health technology
Health ReformMedical InnovationsPublic HealthTechnology

Big Names Changing the Future of Personalized Patient Care

October 31, 2014

Social Media in Healthcare—Where is it Leading Us?

April 17, 2012
medical marketing with youtube
BusinesseHealthFinanceSocial Media

Do You Need a YouTube Channel for Your Medical Practice?

May 15, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?