By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Medicaid: Not Just for the Poor Anymore
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > Medicaid: Not Just for the Poor Anymore
Health ReformPolicy & Law

Medicaid: Not Just for the Poor Anymore

JohnCGoodman
JohnCGoodman
Share
2 Min Read
SHARE

In 1965, Medicaid was conceived as a program to provide acute care for people who had no other resources. As the graph shows, it has been expanded far beyond its original scope. Reformers in the 1990s who wanted to expand it to cover everyone under 65 were successful in passing one expansion after another. As a result, the program is no longer limited to providing acute care to people in poverty. Given the rising incomes of people covered under the program, Congress might consider giving states the flexibility to create their own copayment and deductible requirements. Congress first allowed Medicaid copayments in 1982. Unless a state Medicaid program operates under a waiver, the maximum deductible must be “nominal” in amount. Nominal is currently interpreted to be limited to a deductible of $2.00 per month per family, with copayments for services that range from $1.00 to $3.00. In short, the pricing structure of Medicaid is so out of whack that Medicaid clients find that it costs about as much to check into an emergency department as it does to buy lunch off the McDonald’s Dollar Menu. Medicaid cost-sharing is even less than meets the eye when one considers that it may not be applied to emergency services for people with serious conditions, family planning supplies, services for children, services for pregnant women, or services to people in hospitals or institutionalized long-term care. (Thanks to Michael Bond for suggesting the graph.)

TAGGED:health care businessMedicaid
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Veneers vs. Crowns vs. Bonding: Understanding Cosmetic Options
Veneers vs. Crowns vs. Bonding: Understanding Cosmetic Options
Dental health Specialties
June 23, 2026
dental implants
Dental Implants and Quality of Life: What the Outcomes Data Shows
Dental health Specialties
June 23, 2026
Why Outpatient Addiction Treatment Works Better Than Most People Expect
Addiction Addiction Recovery
June 20, 2026
grief affects brain
How Grief Affects The Brain And Body
Infographics Mental Health
June 19, 2026

You Might also Like

Florida Appeals Court Sets Date for Arguments Surrounding Reform Law’s Constitutionality

April 3, 2011
MA governor health views
Policy & LawPublic Health

Healthcare Backgrounds of Candidates for Governor of Massachusetts

March 20, 2014

1/3 Women Living with Chronic Health Conditions

June 29, 2011
obama and healthcare
Health ReformPolicy & LawPublic Health

Study: Mass. Reform Did Not Substantially Raise Acute Care Costs

May 21, 2013
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?