By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Where is the Device Industry’s Seat at the “Network of Experts” Table?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Global Healthcare > Where is the Device Industry’s Seat at the “Network of Experts” Table?
BusinessGlobal HealthcareHealth ReformMedical DevicesMedical InnovationsNewsPolicy & LawTechnology

Where is the Device Industry’s Seat at the “Network of Experts” Table?

Patti Doherty
Patti Doherty
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

Recent draft polices from the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) have created concern by industry members that they have been left out of the “network of experts,” a program to supplement the FDA’s existing expertise and to expedite the review process.

Recent draft polices from the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) have created concern by industry members that they have been left out of the “network of experts,” a program to supplement the FDA’s existing expertise and to expedite the review process. Despite the fact that the FDA has more than 800 scientists, engineers and clinicians, the agency believes that it is impractical to expect CDRH staff to keep current with so many new and complex technologies surfacing.

The network of experts is designed to be a resource for CDRH, particularly to address questions on emerging and unfamiliar technologies. The outside organizations that are being considered by CDRH for inclusion in the network “…will include professional scientific and medical organizations and academic institutions.”  Even though we have not yet heard what organizations the FDA will use in a pilot program to assess their new process, a number of organizations are interested in participating in the program. Industry also would like a seat at the table.

AdvaMed voiced concerns in a written response to the draft policies. The trade organization raised the following issues:

More Read

When The RN Needs To Relax: Solutions To Help Nurses Manage Stress
Are Online Doctor’s Appointments a Trend or New Reality?
MedStar SiTEL Achieves Accreditation by SSH
Marketing to Physicians? Think Education and Email
What’s Next for Wearable Technology and What It Means for Health Data
  • How will confidential information such as intellectual property and trade secrets be kept confidential?   What mechanisms will the FDA deploy to maintain confidentiality?
  • When reaching out to experts in a particular area, it is very likely those individuals have been involved in the development and design of a similar device, especially if the technology is new. This brings up the potential for conflict of interest. AdvaMed makes the point that conflict of interest is a concern in industry as it is in academia and that a process for excluding any potential conflicts should be implemented prior to the exchange of information. The organization also points out that academic institutions are often involved in industry-sponsored programs and may have ties that could create a conflict.
  • The FDA needs to create a balanced and diverse selection of experts to avoid bias.  All stakeholders, including industry, should be allowed to nominate organizations and nominees should include industry scientists. It is preferable that the FDA not select from a pool of experts who are regularly called upon to consult since this may not allow for an objective assessment of a novel device.
  • Efficiency and timeliness: There is skepticism that the FDA could provide a rapid turnaround (i.e., two weeks) when engaging the network of experts on a particular topic.   Large institutions are not known for making decisions in a rapid and efficient manner.

As life science consultants who represent many companies within the device industry, we are closely monitoring the FDA’s draft policies. It will be interesting to see who will be a part of the network of experts and how they will provide their expertise. We wonder, will CDRH be able to comply with its own rule of conduct for transparency while at the same time maintaining confidential and proprietary information at the review level?

Who do you think should be part of the network of experts?  What should the vetting process be? Is there even a need for a network of experts?  Please share your thoughts with us here or email me directly at doherty@popperandco.com.

 

This article originally appeared on the Popper and Co blog.

TAGGED:drug developmentFDANetwork of Experts
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

a woman walking on the hallway
6 Easy Healthcare Ways to Sit Less and Move More Every Day
Health
September 9, 2025
Clinical Expertise
Healthcare at a Crossroads: Why Leadership Matters More Than Ever
Global Healthcare
September 9, 2025
travel nurse in north carolina
Balancing Speed and Scope: Choosing the Nursing Degree That Fits Your Goals
Nursing
September 1, 2025
intimacy
How to Keep Intimacy Comfortable as You Age
Relationship and Lifestyle Senior Care
September 1, 2025

You Might also Like

drug take-back day
Policy & Law

Drug Take-Back Day: April 27

April 19, 2013

Medicare Is Lousy Insurance

May 2, 2011
Healthcare Digital Footprint
BusinessSocial Media

Why Should You Establish a Healthcare Digital Footprint?

December 29, 2011

Awaiting Results of Virginia Appeal Court

May 9, 2011
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?