Disruptive Physician Toolkit
“Disruptive Physician” is one of the most misused terms in healthcare these days.
In many organizations, those two words have become the c-suite’s trump card to quash any physician resistance to new administrative programs. These programs are often have purely financial motives or are a brazen attempt to dump additional tasks on the physicians with no regard for their workload or stress levels.
The doctor’s legitimate concerns about quality of care don’t matter. They are lost in the politics of the silos of the administrative and clinical sides of the organization. They are quickly seen as not being a “team player”. The “disruptive physician” label comes flying out and the doctor is deftly tossed under the bus so the meeting can move on to the next topic.
This abusive labeling is bullying, plain and simple and it has significant, long term negative consequences. It is the quickest way for the administration to destroy trust on the clinical side of the business. It often creates permanent consequences for the physician, including diversion into any number of “treatment programs” and not uncommonly losing their job.
[Note: Here is a legitimate use of the term disruptive physician ]
In this article let me share three points
1) Disruptive physician labeling is incredibly common … as survey results from our physician community attest.
2) Everyone loses when this happens; the administration, the physicians and the patients.
3) The “ Disruptive Physician ‘s” Toolkit –
– When you have a legitimate concern that must be heard
– And you don’t want to be labeled or ostracized
These simple steps show you how to communicate like an administrator. They allow you to you raise your concern in a way that you will be heard and avoid the dreaded disruptive physician label.
1) Disruptive Physician labeling/bullying is incredibly common and becoming more so
In a recent survey of our HappyMD community, 41% of doctors had been labeled disruptive physician at least once and 25% more than once. Administration bullying of physicians and the inappropriate use of disruptive physician label are common topics on physician websites generating long strings of “me too” comments.
The rapid changes in the healthcare system in the US are driving much more frequent clashes between clinical quality and basic business principles. Most organizations are not set up to honor the input of the physicians. Disruptive physician labeling is accelerating.
2) Everyone loses
When an administrator gets their way with the disruptive physician bully tactic, it is the most effective way to destroy trust on the entire clinical side of the business. Sure, their administrative colleagues may cheer them “keeping the doctors in line”. They have won what they perceive as a battle and are preparing the ground to lose the war.
It is important to keep in mind who performs the cash flow generating activities in a healthcare business. No doctors, no dollars. Unhappy and betrayed doctors behave in multiple ways that cripple the organization.
It is equally important administrators understand the doctors don’t consider this to be just a business. To physicians medicine is a calling, an art and a science and an honor we have dedicated our lives to. When we are called out as a disruptive physician for raising a legitimate clinical concern to an administrator who has never seen patients … is a world class insult.
This is the shortest path any administrator can take to a toxic culture in the workplace. You will pay in physician and staff turnover. If administration wants to know why innovation is so slow to be adopted in the organization, they only need to look in the mirror. The negative effects will roll down to the staff and the level of care quality and patient satisfaction … guaranteed.
If there is an organization in the same town that values the input of their physicians and gives them equal power in the decision making committees of the organization … a place where the physicians know that administration “has my back” … this organization will outperform the dysfunctional organization hands down in all areas.
3) The Disruptive Physician Toolkit
– how to raise your concerns and avoid being labeled
The disruptive physician label is often a consequence of a monumental clash between a the communication style of a physician and that of an administrator.
Physicians vs. Administration – the battle of communication styles
We are highly trained experts at finding a unifying diagnosis … the crux of the problem … the thing that is likely to go wrong. We see clinical issues administrators are completely unaware of. We do all of this at lightening speed, because in our diagnoses often must be made quickly.
When we see a problem, we point it out without hesitation and we are not used to having to explain ourselves. And we shoot from the hip – see it and call it, without regard to the social setting or the politically correct thing to say in the given situation. One word for this is “blurting”.
This is not how you make your point to an administrator. They do not think or communicate in this fashion. 85% of the reason for disruptive physician labeling is this clash of communication styles.
If the first time you raise a clinical concern with a proposed workplace “innovation” is by blurting it out in a meeting — using a declarative statement with little emotion attached — you are 85% of the way to gaining your first disruptive physician label and probably don’t see it coming.
Let me show you some simple principles of communication with administrators that will
– Allow you to make your legitimate point
– Be heard by the administration
– Avoid being labeled disruptive physician
Things to do …
If you have a concern, talk to as many people as possible BEFORE the meeting where this program will be discussed
To raise a concern for the first time in the midst of a meeting is the definition of rude to an administrator. Discovery and building of consensus is best done before the meeting occurs – much like the work in politics is done in conversations before they vote on the bill on the floor.
You want your concern to be discussed, shared, understood and at least a partial consensus on what to do about it … all done BEFORE any committee meeting.
Always ask questions – rather than making statements
Ask questions of everyone involved in the proposal and everyone who will be part of the decision on whether or not it goes forward.
Always start your questions with the word “what” or “how“
This guarantees an open ended question that will draw the maximum of information from the person to whom you are speaking.
Here are some very simple and powerful examples:
– “What are your thoughts on program “X”?”
– “How do you see program “X” affecting the quality of care?”
– “I have some concerns about “X”. How do you see we might be able to address them?”
“Maybe this is a silly question, but I was wondrin … “
I understand Columbo’s style goes against your doctor programming to be “seldom wrong and never in doubt”. Please do your best to let that go. Columbo was never called disruptive and was always very effective.
– Until you actually try asking questions instead of telling people what to do (giving orders)
– Until you try channeling Columbo when you speak
– You have no idea how massively effective this is with administrators
Find solutions and build consensus
In your pre-meeting discussions, if you find your concern is shared by your colleagues, build consensus (before the meeting) on several solutions or ideas to address your concerns. You will have consensus on the concern and the possible solutions in your back pocket before the meeting begins.
Appeal to the highest value possible at all times
Always keep the team focused on the highest possible corporate value – one that everyone can agree to. Usually this will be quality of care or patient satisfaction. This is your trump card.
When you are bringing up any clinical concern about an administration proposal, relate it to one of these higher values whenever you can. It can sound like this.
“I know we all agree that none of us wants the quality of care to suffer as a result of this initiative.”
This phrase used early and often keeps everyone focused on the big picture, and not your objection. It states something no one can disagree with and keeps them from immediately disagreeing with you.
If it becomes clear you will be overruled – propose a pilot project with metrics
If you feel this decision is flawed and inevitable, suggest a limited pilot project with before and after metrics to make sure your concern did not occur.
“Well, looks like this patient flow program is going to happen then. What do you think about a pilot project just in “A” wing with before and after surveys of chart delinquency, and provider satisfaction and stress levels to go with your flow measurements.” (open ended question)
“I know we don’t want quality of care to suffer here.” (appeal to higher value)
What NOT to do …
Don’t communicate like a doctor
Do not raise your concern the way you would normally do on automatic pilot … as a declarative statement of fact.
“I think this is a bad idea and here’s why.”
ALWAYS ask a question. Remember to channel Columbo. Be either curious or confused
“I am confused here. (Columbo)
This patient flow initiative is supposed to make it easier to see 35 patients a day, but a number of us here are concerned it will only increase the EMR documentation backlog and that will affect the quality of care. I am curious what your thoughts are about our concerns here Ms. CEO?” (open ended question)
Do not show any emotion that could be perceived as negative
– Stand up
– Raise your voice
– Furrow your brow
– Slam your fist on the table, point fingers, slam doors, swear, throw things
– Or send any body language signals of anger, frustration or hostility
Focus on your breathing and asking questions
If you do feel any of these emotions, name them out loud
Let people know what you are feeling with a civil tongue … just make sure you have done the work before the meeting so that everyone is aware of your concerns and feelings.
“I must admit when I hear your answer, what comes up for me is frustration. I am curious (Columbo) what we can come up with for a proposal here that could address both of our concerns. “ (open ended question)
Do not leave a paper trail or voice mail trail.
It is completely appropriate to be seriously paranoid about documentation of any of your concerns in a format that could be shared. Your concerns are best relayed exclusively in conversations.
Do not send emails, text messages, messages through your EMR or leave voice mails ESPECIALLY if you are upset and venting to someone you feel is a trusted colleague. If you must vent in an email, write it and then delete it. Do not create a paper or voice mail trail.
If you do leave recorded or written evidence of your concerns, you are running an almost 100% risk of those documents or voice mails falling into the hands of someone who will label you as the next disruptive physician on staff. Here’s why.
It is impossible for them NOT to take your concerns and tone out of context
Make sure you raise your concerns in conversations, where the other person can understand your energy, tone, body language and caring for everyone involved – especially the patients. There is no way any of that can be understood through a text, email or voice message, especially by an administrator who does not agree with or understand your position.
Ultimately, if you work in an organization with a pattern of hostility towards the physicians and clinical staff and a habit of bullying with the disruptive physician label … you will decide whether that is something you will tolerate or not. You always have the option to vote with your feet.
If you do decide to leave, it is my intention that this disruptive physician toolkit ensures …
– Your concerns have been heard
– You gave it your best shot at ensuring the program made clinical sense
– You don’t have the disruptive physician label hanging round your neck to get in the way of you finding a better position
PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT
– Have you ever been labeled a disruptive physician?
– If you are in a leadership position, what communication tools do you use to avoid the disruptive physician label ?
– If you have tried channeling Columbo, how did that go for you?