By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Everything We Know in Health is Wrong. Medicine is a Science, Not Dogma. #askforevidence
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Public Health > Everything We Know in Health is Wrong. Medicine is a Science, Not Dogma. #askforevidence
Public Health

Everything We Know in Health is Wrong. Medicine is a Science, Not Dogma. #askforevidence

Conor McKechnie
Conor McKechnie
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

Reading the BMJ today I was struck by a number of stories that appear to tell us that nothing is what we think it is in medical practice.

There were reports contravening current thinking in areas ranging from flu vaccines, breast cancer, health screening and more…partly this is obvious, as studies that simply confirm what we belive often don’t merit even a news in brief.

But partly, I thought, a lay reader (like myself) might think: “Gosh, haven’t we got it all wrong?!”

Well, yes. And, no.

More Read

Pharmaceutical Research in Obesity
Expansion of Medicare Rewards Adds Key Tool to Drive Behavior Change
Listen to Your Patient and They Will Tell You the Problem: A True Story
Data Alone Does Not Make Health Care Pricing Meaningful
3 Limitations of Australia’s Public Healthcare System and How to Deal with them

Reading the BMJ today I was struck by a number of stories that appear to tell us that nothing is what we think it is in medical practice.

There were reports contravening current thinking in areas ranging from flu vaccines, breast cancer, health screening and more…partly this is obvious, as studies that simply confirm what we belive often don’t merit even a news in brief.

But partly, I thought, a lay reader (like myself) might think: “Gosh, haven’t we got it all wrong?!”

Well, yes. And, no.

The answer is buried in a research paper in the same issue (Ferreira et al BMJ 2012;345:e5913) that asks “When is a further clinical trial justified?”:

“The role of clinical trials is to provide unbiased estimates of the beneficial effects of health interventions so that it can be ascertained whether those effects outweigh risks, costs, and inconvenience”

That’s the key – changes to medical practice and understanding should be driven by the evidence. Not by what we want to believe, and what we cling to as “established wisdom”.

The litany of accepted health truths being slowly demolished by research may be cause for dejection and depression among casual observers, but I think this is something that we should celebrate. Yes, celebrate.

 

Source: gigipeterkin.com via Conor on Pinterest

 

 

Ferreira et al explain how to assess the need for further research around a given interevention, urging reason in thinking about how and when to challenge established medical practice.

That is, scientific method is alive and well: We should continually question, even accepted knowledge. If we hadn’t Columbus would not have gone to America, Einstein would not have developed the theory of relativity, and Frank Zappa would not have broken the boundaries between rock, jazz and classical music. Quite simply, the world would be a lesserr place.

We should not allow ourselves to rest on the dogma of previous research when good scientific method throws up challenges to what we previously believe. So I celebrate these articles that make us think and challenge what we may have accepted previously as good medical practice based on the fullness of the then currently available information.

For the record, the articles that sparked this rant are:

Belief not science is behind flu jab promotion: Telling us that an independent meta-analysis of vaccines against flu has found that claims of benefit have been significantly exaggerated. Pharma watch out for a Daily Mail backlash BMJ 2012;345:e7856

Mammography results in substantial overdiagnosis of breast cancer, concludes study: Adding grist to the mill of this long-debated question. BMJ 2012;345:e7910

The value of conducting periodic health checks:A study shows there is no evidence that general health checks are effective, and may increase overdiagnosis.Expensive executive health screen, anyone? BMJ 2012;345:e7775

 

Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

dental care
Importance of Good Dental Care for Health and Confidence
Dental health Specialties
October 2, 2025
AI in Healthcare
AI in Healthcare: Technology is Transforming the Global Landscape
Global Healthcare Policy & Law Technology
October 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Swimwear for Health and Safety
News
September 30, 2025
sports concussions
Concussion In Sports: How Common They Are And What You Need To Know
Infographics
September 28, 2025

You Might also Like

Why Clinicians Need to Embrace Their HIT Teams

January 25, 2016
medical marijuana
NewsPolicy & LawPublic Health

New Research on Health Benefits of Marijuana Use

May 17, 2017

Medical Homes – A Boost to Primary Care

November 27, 2011

CLL and Lymphoma Drug Approvals: Kudos to the FDA

July 30, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?