By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    health benefits of taking a vacation to reduce stress
    Relaxing European Destinations to Reduce Stress Risks to Health
    October 11, 2021
    pain management tips
    Managing Pain Differently: Alternative Pain Management Techniques
    January 12, 2022
    5 Ways to Promote Wellness in Your Home
    April 12, 2022
    Latest News
    Getting Back in the Game: Sports Injuries Rehabilitation Tips
    May 31, 2023
    4 Signs It’s Time to See a Therapist
    May 24, 2023
    11 Ways To Modernize Your Private Practice
    May 17, 2023
    How to Recognize the Signs of Hormonal Imbalance in Men
    May 29, 2023
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Seven Senior Health Tips For The Holidays
    December 21, 2011
    Health Affairs Briefing Addresses Costly Consequences of Diabetes Treatment in America
    January 12, 2012
    How PPACA fixes some of the problems of Part D
    August 23, 2017
    Latest News
    MRI Sedation Options: What You Should Know Before Screening
    May 17, 2023
    What is the Process of Creating Medicine from Nature?
    May 2, 2023
    Choosing the Right Treatment Option for Varicose Veins
    May 2, 2023
    What Are Wrong-Site Surgeries and How Do They Occur?
    April 27, 2023
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: The Fiction Behind The Cost of New Drugs
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Aa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Aa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > The Fiction Behind The Cost of New Drugs
BusinessNews

The Fiction Behind The Cost of New Drugs

gooznews
Last updated: 2012/02/18 at 8:59 AM
gooznews
Share
10 Min Read
SHARE

The following column appeared yesterday in The Fiscal Times:

The following column appeared yesterday in The Fiscal Times:

The drug industry usually defends the high price on drugs – the latest cancer therapies are tipping the scales at $100,000 a year – by pointing to the large sums it spends on research and development. It is true that drug firms spend alarger share of their revenue on R&D than most other industries, typically anywhere from 15 to 20 percent of sales. And Eli Lilly ran a Super Bowl ad claiming the cost of developing a new drug has now risen to more than $1.3 billion.

Now Matthew Herper of Forbes Magazine, usually an insightful writer on the drug industry, has raised the stakes. He wrote last week that the cost of developing a new drug had reached breathtaking level of $3.7 billion to $11.8 billion.

More Read

endoscope maintenance

The Complete Guide To Endoscope Maintenance

Types of Remote Access Solutions for Hospitals
Evaluating the Trustworthiness of a Health Supplement Brand
Tips to Manage Stress and Burnout in the Mental Health Sector
Strategies for Active Smokers Trying to Minimize Harm

Don’t grab two aspirin quite yet. “The Truly Staggering Cost of Developing New Drugs,” read the headline. “The Flat Tax Theory of Drug Industry R&D,” would have been a more appropriate title.

Some background: despite annual R&D expenditures in the billions, large companies like AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Merck only develop a handful of new drugs each year. Most new drug candidates fail, usually in the early stages before they even reach clinical trials. But even when they’ve passed safety studies and seem likely to improve outcomes for people with a disease, the potential new drugs will fail their final trials about half the time.

Clearly, drug development is a risky business. Just ask any of the hundreds of start-up biotechnology companies that have burned through their venture capital cash and gone belly-up. When you’ve only got one molecule in development, which is typical of start-ups, you’re banking everything on its success. The simple odds say that half the time you’re going to fail. They are not bad businessmen. It’s science. The drug and biotechnology industries are the most science-intensive and science-driven in the world, and scientific theories sometimes don’t pan out.

For many years, industry supporters have tried to create a metric for measuring the cost of developing a new drug. The Tufts University Center for the Study of Drug Development, which receives industry funding, has developed a methodology that’s widely recognized by the economics profession. Its studies are the basis for the Eli Lilly ad’s claims.

I think they’re wrong, and the $1.3 billion-per-new-drug number is hogwash.

But let me start by saying I’m not a disinterested observer in this debate. I wrote a book claiming the figure was substantially lower (“The $800 Million Pill: The Truth Behind the Cost of New Drugs”) and the title chapter sought to debunk the Tufts methodology.

Here’s the short-hand version of my argument. First, the Tufts economists overestimated total costs by adjusting the multi-year costs for developing any single drug for inflation over the lifetime of its development and treating it like capital investment. That misses the crucial point that R&D isn’t a capital expense. It’s an annual write-off from a company’s top line and thus a deduction from taxable profits. No industry capitalizes R&D costs. The drug industry doesn’t either, including in its accounting statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, it shouldn’t in its public propaganda.

Second, the Tufts researchers failed to account for research that is driven by the marketing needs of the firm, such as coming up with so-called me-too drugs or drugs designed to replace drugs coming off patent. Neither generates new drugs that are any different from what’s already on the market, and should more properly be considered a marketing expense.

Companies also conduct hundreds of clinical trials every year, the most expensive part of drug development, that are not designed to win new approvals or even win new approved indications for old drugs. They are designed by companies to encourage physicians to use their drug. The industry even has a name for this kind of R&D: seeding trials.

My bottom line: after discounting for improper accounting and marketing-driven R&D, the cost of drug development on average was probably less than half of what Tufts claimed, somewhere around $250 million at that time (2004).

So how did Forbes’ Herper get his outlandish numbers? He totaled up individual company R&D expenditures over the past 14 years (the expected patent life of a new medicine) and divided it by the number of new drugs brought to market by each company during that time period. AstraZeneca got the booby prize: it spent $59 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars on R&D and only pushed five new pills through the Food and Drug Administration.

That’s “as much as the top-selling medicine ever generated in annual sales,” he lamented. “At $12 billion per drug, inventing medicines is a pretty unsustainable business.” You’d never know through his accounting that AstraZeneca earned $70 billion in non-inflation-adjusted dollars since 1997, which is far more than it invested in R&D. Indeed, its after-tax profit margin in 2011 – let me repeat, its profits after all taxes – was over $10 billion or 30 percent of sales, nearly twice what it spent on R&D.

Where did Herper go wrong? First he used inflation-adjusted numbers in his R&D calculation. That unjustifiably inflates the total as I explained earlier. R&D is a cost, not an investment.

Then he divided this total by the number of new, approved drugs developed by the firm. This would include, for instance, Nexium, an acid indigestion pill that the company developed to replace Prilosec, now sold over-the-counter. They are exactly the same medicine with a minor chemical tweak. In fact, half of what’s in Prilosec is Nexium, and both halves work exactly the same way.  Yet insurers, including Medicare, paid $6 billion for Nexium last year, when the people in need of acid indigestion relief could have had an over-the-counter alternative for a fraction of the price.

The latest drug from AstraZeneca is Brilinta, a new anticoagulant in an already crowded field. The FDA deemed it a “standard” drug not worthy of rapid review, i.e., not a significant medical advance. In other words, a lot of the company’s R&D is spent on meeting the financial needs of the firm – not the health needs of society.

Herper also erred in dividing the total R&D expenses by only five new drugs. How about all the post-marketing trials paid for out of the company’s R&D budgets that were designed to get more doctors to prescribe all the medicines in its portfolio? The governments’ database on clinical trials contains 40 Phase IV clinical trials for Nexium (these are trials done after a drug has been approved) sponsored by AstraZeneca. They included such need-to-know studies as how well does reducing acid indigestion help people sleep at night, and does it help people with chronic coughing. These trials, when they appear in the journals that are read by physicians who see people with those conditions, are nothing more than a way of getting doctors to say, “Hey, take this, it might help.”

The company also made more than two dozen submissions to the FDA last year for labeling revisions and expanded indications for existing drugs, all of which were supported by science produced by its R&D department. These post-marketing changes, too, often depend on expensive clinical trials.

The folks in the R&D departments at major drug companies and biotech start-ups spend lots of money doing a multitude of tasks – including new drug development, all of which are part of what it takes to run a for-profit company in the modern drug industry. But never forget that many of those tasks have little to do with what it “costs” to develop a new drug, which is a metric more useful to companies trying to justify the high prices of their latest medicines than a society trying to figure out how it is going to afford them.

TAGGED: pharmaceuticals

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
gooznews February 18, 2012
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article Small Business Health Insurance Tax Credit: Cashews on the Hindenburg
Next Article Congress Has a Panel on Women’s Health and No Women Were Invited At the House Hearing – ”Default Topics” of Abortions and Birth Control Returned to the Floor

Stay Connected

1.5k Followers Like
4.5k Followers Follow
2.8k Followers Pin
136k Subscribers Subscribe

Latest News

medical bills
Who is Responsible for Paying the Medical Bills After an Injury?
News June 1, 2023
sports injury rehabilitation
Getting Back in the Game: Sports Injuries Rehabilitation Tips
Health May 31, 2023
brush your day
How Many Times A Day Should You Brush Your Teeth?
Dental health May 29, 2023
Chiropractic Laser Therapy: A Beacon of Hope for Chronic Pain Sufferers
Chiropractic Laser Therapy: A Beacon of Hope for Chronic Pain Sufferers
Therapies May 29, 2023

You Might also Like

medical bills
News

Who is Responsible for Paying the Medical Bills After an Injury?

June 1, 2023
News

6 Hidden Health Benefits of Financial Stability

May 23, 2023
healthy cakes
Health

Indulge In Guilt-Free Desserts With These Healthy Cake Recipes

May 22, 2023
hospital sanitation
News

Sterilization Equipment Repair: DIY vs. Professional Service

May 18, 2023
//

We influence million of users and is the most authentic source of information on healthcare business and technology news.

Quick Links

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Follow US

© 2008-2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?