We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Lawsuit Filed Against Quest Diagnostics for Overcharging
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > Lawsuit Filed Against Quest Diagnostics for Overcharging
BusinessHealth ReformPolicy & Law

Lawsuit Filed Against Quest Diagnostics for Overcharging

BarbaraDuck
BarbaraDuck
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

Andrew Baker was fired from a company that Quest purchased, Unilab, when he refused to participate in the scam and the case had been sealed since 2005 but recently re-opened.  I remember the acquisition here with Unilab as they were the big lab in southern California.  At the time I was developing my medical records program and it was a pain from the data side until the two different lab codes were finally combined.  It made it hard to run into the chart with 2 of them to work with.

Andrew Baker was fired from a company that Quest purchased, Unilab, when he refused to participate in the scam and the case had been sealed since 2005 but recently re-opened.  I remember the acquisition here with Unilab as they were the big lab in southern California.  At the time I was developing my medical records program and it was a pain from the data side until the two different lab codes were finally combined.  It made it hard to run into the chart with 2 of them to work with.

You can read more about the case below but a similar case was just settled with the State of California and it all comes back around to contracted negotiated rates and discounts, nothing new there as this had gone on throughout healthcare all over the place.  BD

Quest Diagnostics Agrees to Settle California Medicaid Suit for $241 Million-Overcharging for Lab Tests

Press Release:

Whistleblowers Continue Fight Against Quest In Appeals Court & Call On U.S. Department of Justice To Intervene

New York, NY (July 5, 2011) — As the nation’s leaders struggle to address steep health care costs, a Medicare scam is being orchestrated right under their noses and no one is doing anything to stop it, said former medical laboratory executives who have filed a lawsuit against Quest Diagnostics, Inc., accusing the company of overcharging the federal government by over $1 billion.

The individuals suing Quest called on the U.S. Department of Justice to intervene in their lawsuit, which alleges that the scam industry wide among medical labs is costing taxpayers as much as $15 billion in Medicare and Medicaid overcharges.

Since 1996, the federal government has paid more – sometimes as much as 400 to 500 percent more – than private insurers for some Medicare and Medicaid patients’ lab work conducted by Quest, the nation’s largest lab testing company based in Madison, NJ. The lawsuit claims that billions of dollars in lab fees have been siphoned into illegal kickbacks to private insurers, such as Aetna and Cigna, which are among Quest’s largest contract providers.

“Quest and other labs are ripping off taxpayers, yet the federal government has done nothing. Despite our lawsuit, the scam continues and will until the government makes them pay damages,” said Andrew Baker, one of three former executives of Unilab, purchased by Quest in 2003, who brought the lawsuit.

The details of the fraud can be found in Fair Laboratory Practices Associates vs. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., filed in 2005 under seal before the Southern District Court of New York. The federal court recently unsealed an amended complaint that charges Quest with violations of the Federal False Claims Act and the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute. It can be found here.

Baker wonders why the federal government has not joined his lawsuit, especially since just last month Quest settled a remarkably similar California state claim for $241 million in overcharges to the state’s Medicaid program.  In March 2009, California Attorney General Jerry Brown intervened in that case and a settlement soon followed, returning hundreds of millions of dollars to the state’s coffers.  Baker asserts billions are waiting to be returned to the federal government if the U.S. Department of Justice would join the FLPA case.

The California lawsuit alleged Quest overcharged the state by as much as 400 percent for blood, urine and other tests conducted on Medicaid patients. For example, Quest charged the State of California $8.59 for a complete blood test, but billed private insurers only $1.43.

The fraud is simple: Quest pressures private insurers to lean on doctors to send all their lab work to Quest, for patients insured privately and by Medicare and Medicaid. In return, the private insurers benefit from lower and, in many cases, below-cost, lab fees, effectively subsidized by higher fees for the Medicare and Medicaid patients. Insurers threaten to throw doctors out of  their networks if they  refuse to send their tests for Medicare and Medicaid patients to Quest.

While Baker’s lawsuit names only Quest, the FLPA plaintiffs believe the practice of overbilling Medicare and Medicaid has become widespread throughout the industry, resulting in overpayments of as much as $15 billion.  FLPA has appealed a lower court dismissal of their claims based on procedural grounds. The lower court did not rule on the merits of the case. 

The Quest scam could be the largest Medicare fraud committed by one company. In February 1999, the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services warned against the “pull-through” practice.

###

 

More Read

HIPAA, content marketing
Keeping Your Content Marketing HIPAA-Compliant
Rejoinder to yesterday’s Medicare post
Florida Pill Mill Clinics
Five Conversion Tools for Your Hospital’s Website
Global Health: Determining Cost Effectiveness of New Technologies

TAGGED:healthcare businesshealthcare lawhealthcare reformMedicaidMedicareQuest
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Common Questions About Tirzepatide and Medical Monitoring -- AI-generated illustration
Common Questions About Tirzepatide and Medical Monitoring
Health
October 26, 2026
How Road Trauma Injuries Place Demands on Healthcare That Go Beyond the Examination Room  -- AI-generated illustration
How Road Trauma Injuries Place Demands on Healthcare That Go Beyond the Examination Room 
Global Healthcare Policy & Law
October 15, 2026
Why Music Gives The Brain A Workout -- AI-generated illustration
Why Music Gives The Brain A Workout
Infographics Wellness
October 14, 2026
A Hydration And Heat Guide For Youth Cheer -- AI-generated illustration
A Hydration And Heat Guide For Youth Cheer
Infographics
October 13, 2026

You Might also Like

doctor public service
BusinessPublic HealthWellness

7 Ways to Leverage Public Service Messages in Healthcare Marketing

September 20, 2016
Image
Medical Education

Person-Centered HealthCare: Medical Schools’ Efforts to Address Primary Care Needs

May 3, 2013

Can “Portfolio Theory” Be Applied to NIH Funding Decisions?

May 18, 2012

Long Term Services and Supports Scorecard

October 24, 2011
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?