By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    headphones can create health problems
    The Harmful Health Effects of Using Headphones
    September 24, 2021
    Headache causes
    4 Causes Of Headache You Probably Didn’t Know About
    December 28, 2021
    follow these steps to recover from your injury
    What Steps Should You Take to Recover More Quickly from an Injury?
    April 12, 2022
    Latest News
    Beyond Nutrition: Everyday Foods That Support Whole-Body Health
    June 15, 2025
    The Wide-Ranging Benefits of Magnesium Supplements
    June 11, 2025
    The Best Home Remedies for Migraines
    June 5, 2025
    The Hidden Impact Of Stress On Your Body’s Alignment And Balance
    May 22, 2025
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Cash Transfers: Good for HIV/AIDS Too
    August 9, 2012
    unnecessary medical tests
    Eagerly Awaiting the Death of Defensive Medicine
    September 5, 2013
    Image
    Mobile Health Around the Globe – mHealth Fighting Malnutrition in India
    December 17, 2012
    Latest News
    Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
    July 6, 2025
    Top HIPAA-Compliant Messaging Apps for Healthcare Teams
    June 25, 2025
    When Healthcare Ends, the Legal Process Begins: What Families Should Know About Probate and Medical Estates
    June 20, 2025
    Preventing Contamination In Healthcare Facilities Starts With Hygiene
    June 15, 2025
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Socioeconomic Factors Crucial for Provider Performance Measurement in a Value-Based Paradigm
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > Hospital Administration > Socioeconomic Factors Crucial for Provider Performance Measurement in a Value-Based Paradigm
Hospital Administration

Socioeconomic Factors Crucial for Provider Performance Measurement in a Value-Based Paradigm

Ashish Varshneya
Ashish Varshneya
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

Healthcare reform established several programs to measure provider performance in an effort to improve the quality of care and curb rising healthcare costs.  A key program is the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), which is a payment penalty program that rewards hospitals for reducing preventable readmissions and penalizes those with above-average readmissions.  Several stakeholders have questioned the fairness and long-term sustainability of the program.  A central argument against the current program is the lack of risk-adjustment for vital demographic and socio

Healthcare reform established several programs to measure provider performance in an effort to improve the quality of care and curb rising healthcare costs.  A key program is the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), which is a payment penalty program that rewards hospitals for reducing preventable readmissions and penalizes those with above-average readmissions.  Several stakeholders have questioned the fairness and long-term sustainability of the program.  A central argument against the current program is the lack of risk-adjustment for vital demographic and socioeconomic factors (such as income, occupation, literacy, primary language, race, ethnicity, etc.) that are beyond the hospital’s control, but show a high correlation to the probability of readmission.

The onset of value-based payments that are designed to promote delivery of higher quality and more cost-effective care has necessitated a need to risk adjust payments to payers and/or providers for these socioeconomic factors.  This should be implemented to help ensure equitable reimbursement that is commensurate with the risk, social and economic characteristics of the underlying population being treated and the quality of care delivered.

In October 2015, CMS announced that the agency’s current risk model (CMS-HCC) “underpredicts” the payments to health plans for dual eligible beneficiaries (high-cost members who, because of both their income levels and age or disability status, are dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare) and announced plans to tweak its payment models in hopes of predicting costs more accurately.  This move will presumably yield a higher reimbursement rate for health plans that service these high-cost dual eligibles.  The proposed change to the risk adjustment model is expected to be effective for Payment Year 2017.  In addition, the agency is also considering changes to its five-star quality ratings programs for health plans that serve large populations of disadvantaged patients.

More Read

Better Medical Marketing with the New (and Free) Medicare Data Set of 880,000 Providers
Staying Competitive – Financing Medical Equipment and Technology in the Global Healthcare Market
Looking for Lucrative Customers: Hospital Marketing Gets Serious
NHS Investigating Contaminated Saline at Stepping Hill Hospital
When Evaluating Physician and Nurse Shortages, Consider the Source

These recent announcements by CMS clearly indicate the agency recognizes the impact of an individual’s economic and social characteristics on his or her health status.  This further strengthens the case that similar measures need to be adopted in the provider market to adjust for demographic and socioeconomic factors when measuring performance.  Historically, CMS has resisted adjusting for additional risk, as they believe these factors may mask the disparities in quality of care provided.

However, a number of industry experts, including a National Quality Forum expert panel, believe that socioeconomic adjustments should be made while determining provider performance measures.  They argue that by not doing so providers serving vulnerable populations will be unfairly penalized, which will further reduce resources and worsen disparities in care.  Proponents argue that proper socioeconomic adjustments doesn’t excuse poor care for the disadvantaged population, but rather avoids penalizing safety-net hospitals simply for taking care of more of them.  Industry experts believe that CMS’ current policies disincentivize provision of care to the vulnerable populations, who often depend on these safety-net hospitals for access to entire spectrum of care.

Their view is supported by a growing body of evidence that suggests correlation between socioeconomic factors and a member’s health status and thus adjustment is necessary for equitable hospital assessments.

  • The Missouri Hospital Association augmented the CMS’ readmissions methodology to include Medicaid status, poverty and risk factors attributable to patients’ communities. Further, the augmented methodology was applied to the Missouri hospital data.  A side-by-side analysis of the current system vs. the socioeconomic augmented methodology suggested that 43% – 88% of the quality variances can be explained by socioeconomic factors.
  • In June 2014, Truven Center for Healthcare Analytics found that race and financial status were strong predictors of higher readmission rates. About 18% of a community’s readmissions can be attributed to unemployment.  The analysis also found that about 6% of readmissions could be attributed to poverty among the elderly, and that the chances of hospital readmission were almost 15% higher for certain demographics based on race vs. others who were otherwise similar.

These recent studies clearly suggest that socioeconomic adjusters are important not only for provider performance measurement but also broadly in the value-based payment paradigm.  The debate continues and time will tell if CMS continues its stance on the exclusion of socioeconomic factors for determining provider performance measures.  In the interim, let us know what you think.

Ashish

TAGGED:CMSsocioeconomicsvalue-based pricing
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

9 Lifestyle Tweaks That Can Add Years to Your Life
9 Healthcare Lifestyle Tweaks That can Add Years to Your Life
lifestyle
July 11, 2025
car accident lawsuit
Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
Policy & Law
July 6, 2025
women dental care
What Is a Smile Makeover and How Much Does It Cost?
Dental health
June 30, 2025
HIPAA-Compliant Messaging Apps
Top HIPAA-Compliant Messaging Apps for Healthcare Teams
Global Healthcare Policy & Law Technology
June 25, 2025

You Might also Like

BusinessHospital AdministrationMedical InnovationsNewsPolicy & LawTechnology

Healthcare: Survival of The Fittest

February 17, 2012

Anatomy of a Doctor – Infographic

December 21, 2011
Healthcare Administrators: Lighten Your Load With These 4 Tips
Hospital Administration

Healthcare Administrators: Lighten Your Load With These 4 Tips

August 4, 2017

The $9.2 Million Hospital Bill

July 29, 2011
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?