We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Vermont Legislature Gets Closer to Single Payer Care Delivery
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > Vermont Legislature Gets Closer to Single Payer Care Delivery
Health Reform

Vermont Legislature Gets Closer to Single Payer Care Delivery

MichaelDouglas1
MichaelDouglas1
Share
2 Min Read
SHARE

The state’s Senate has just passed a bill that will now go to conference to reconcile differences between it and the House version. The governor all but says he’ll sign the single payer bill into law.

The state’s Senate has just passed a bill that will now go to conference to reconcile differences between it and the House version. The governor all but says he’ll sign the single payer bill into law. Vermont’s public delivery system will be known as Green Mountain Care.[1] The governor, a democrat, appears to be on an agenda to show the other 48 states that one-fits-all healthcare financing works — emphasizing quality and efficiency in delivery.

The state’s healthcare costs total around $350M annually. Backers of the delivery system tout the elimination of so-called administrative expenses in Vermont’s healthcare delivery. With all of the apparent excitement among single payer’s supporters, there are the detractors. Hospitals, health plans, and provider groups are rightly concerned about the cost to taxpayers; the normalization of deductibles and copays among potential beneficiaries (the state’s entire population); and the need to secure a waiver to pilot this entire system prior to 2014 — when supporters hope single payer is installed. An ambitious schedule, no doubt. History in the making? Perhaps. | LINK

  1. A five-member board would actually design the system, including what benefits are covered and how they’re paid for.

Related posts:

More Read

Trends in Medical Care – Overview
Providing High-Quality Health Care to Americans Should Trump Politics
Health Exchange Confusion: WSJ Style
Improving the US Health System: Biggest Obstacles
Cost of Injection Jumps from $15 to $1,500
  1. Single Payer Physician Advocacy Group Comes to Minnesota This Week They’re on tour, and they’re “mad as hell”. I’m talking…
  2. Op-Ed: Choice of Minnesota Governor Profoundly Affects Healthcare Delivery Minneapolis Star Tribune columnist Lori Sturdevant pulls no punches on…
  3. Study Commissioned by Texas Legislature Confirms Dire Medicaid Financing Scenarios State government’s intentions to possibly opt out of Medicaid is…

 

TAGGED:health care reformVermont
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: The article connects routine visual inspection and accurate barrier fit with protection of peristoma
Peristomal Skin Care: Healthy Skin, Irritation Causes, and When to See a WOC Nurse
Health Nursing
November 2, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: Clinical-trial operations editorial illustration combining healthcare and technology: country-specif
Clinical Study Operations Across Eastern European Research Markets
Health
October 31, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: A health-editorial scene of a first pain-management visit, bringing together attentive consultation,
What to Expect at Your First Pain Management Appointment
Therapies Wellness
October 29, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The core relationship is medication-only coverage versus coverage for a supervised clinical program.
Medical Weight Loss as a Workplace Benefit: The Questions I Would Want Asked
Weight Loss Wellness
October 29, 2026

You Might also Like

obamacare health exchanges
BusinessHealth ReformPolicy & LawPublic Health

What’s the Deal with the Exchanges?

October 13, 2013
Standing room only at the APTA 2013 Conference
Health ReformMedical InnovationsPublic HealthWellness

Innovative Care Models for Prevention, Health Promotion, Fitness and Disease Management

July 2, 2013

Some Further Disruptive Changes in HealthCare Delivery

September 24, 2012
low cost healthcare
BusinessHealth ReformNewsPublic HealthTechnology

High Quality, Low Cost HealthCare: Thoughts for Our Upcoming Webinar

July 16, 2013
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?