By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    Reasons For Hair Loss and Its Treatment
    Reasons For Hair Loss and Its Treatment
    February 16, 2022
    healthcare organization
    5 Actionable Strategies For Healthcare Organizations
    August 15, 2022
    7 Truths and Myths about Being a Full-time Emergency Doctor in a Big Hospital
    7 Truths and Myths about Being a Full-time Emergency Doctor in a Big Hospital
    October 6, 2022
    Latest News
    Getting Back in the Game: Sports Injuries Rehabilitation Tips
    May 31, 2023
    4 Signs It’s Time to See a Therapist
    May 24, 2023
    11 Ways To Modernize Your Private Practice
    May 17, 2023
    How to Recognize the Signs of Hormonal Imbalance in Men
    May 29, 2023
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Medicaid to Fund ‘Stay-Healthy’ Incentive Programs
    September 12, 2017
    The Curious Case of Testosterone
    March 14, 2012
    HSAs vs. HRAs: Which is Better?
    May 19, 2011
    Latest News
    MRI Sedation Options: What You Should Know Before Screening
    May 17, 2023
    What is the Process of Creating Medicine from Nature?
    May 2, 2023
    Choosing the Right Treatment Option for Varicose Veins
    May 2, 2023
    What Are Wrong-Site Surgeries and How Do They Occur?
    April 27, 2023
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Delaying the “Employer Mandate”
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Aa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Aa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Delaying the “Employer Mandate”
Policy & Law

Delaying the “Employer Mandate”

Brad Wright
Last updated: 2013/07/05 at 8:23 AM
Brad Wright
Share
4 Min Read
Image
SHARE

Much ado has been made about the Obama Administration’s decision this week to delay implementation of what most media sources are calling a “key” part of the law for an additional year, until 2015. The provision under question is not only being proclaimed instrumental to the Affordable Care Act, it is also being misrepresented as the “employer mandate.” I’ve been sick this week, and am just beginning to feel better, so I don’t have the time or the energy to explain all of the politics being played by both sides on this issue.

Much ado has been made about the Obama Administration’s decision this week to delay implementation of what most media sources are calling a “key” part of the law for an additional year, until 2015. The provision under question is not only being proclaimed instrumental to the Affordable Care Act, it is also being misrepresented as the “employer mandate.” I’ve been sick this week, and am just beginning to feel better, so I don’t have the time or the energy to explain all of the politics being played by both sides on this issue. But, I did want to make sure that I took a moment to put some clear information out there.Image

The provision, you see, is not an employer “mandate,” but a “penalty.” The details make this apparent: First, it applies only to businesses with more than 50 employees. These are large firms, and upwards of 90% of them already offer their employees insurance. Second, these businesses are not required to provide insurance to their employees. They are merely at risk of having to pay a penalty to the federal government if they do not offer insurance or if they offer insurance that is deemed unaffordable and at least one of their employees then receives a federal subsidy to purchase insurance through the health insurance exchanges. (The Kaiser Family Foundation has an excellent flowchart depicting how all of this works.) Finally, the cost of the penalty is far below the cost of providing insurance, which, combined with the first point that an overwhelming majority of businesses subject to this penalty already provide coverage to their employees, simply underscores that the intent of this provision is not to mandate the provision of insurance, but rather to prevent employers from deciding to stop offering coverage altogether, while letting the health insurance exchanges pick up the slack.

That strategy–known as “crowd-out”–makes sense for businesses if there’s no penalty for the practice. Why not save all of the money being spent on insurance premiums and let Uncle Sam pick up the tab instead? It’s a no-brainer. Thus, the penalty is necessary to discourage it. Does pushing back the penalty by a year really change much? Highly unlikely. Again, most employers with more than 50 employees are already providing coverage. They’re not likely to stop doing that for the single year (2014) when there will be no penalty, but there will be viable health insurance exchanges for their employees to access. The backlash from such an executive decision would be disastrous for most businesses, and not worth the hassle.

More Read

comparative negligence

Not Knowing About Comparative Negligence Can Worsen Your Medical Debt

The Role Addiction Plays in Increasing the Risk of Traffic Accidents
What Are Bioidentical Hormones Made With?
Cover Medical Costs of Child Dog Bites with Legal Specialists
3 Ways to Improve the U.S. Healthcare System By 2030

Instead, I think this has more to do with the Obama Administration confronting the reality that implementing comprehensive health reform is a massive undertaking, with unintended obstacles encountered as the process progresses. Kudos to them for listening to–and attempting to address–the grievances of American businesses. Well, that, or playing politics with the mid-term elections. Who knows?

image: USHealthcare/shutterstock       

TAGGED: employer mandate

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Brad Wright July 5, 2013
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article Assorted fruits and vegetables Shopping Healthy
Next Article MetaMed Offers You a Team of Expert Research Physicians

Stay Connected

1.5k Followers Like
4.5k Followers Follow
2.8k Followers Pin
136k Subscribers Subscribe

Latest News

medical bills
Who is Responsible for Paying the Medical Bills After an Injury?
News June 1, 2023
sports injury rehabilitation
Getting Back in the Game: Sports Injuries Rehabilitation Tips
Health May 31, 2023
brush your day
How Many Times A Day Should You Brush Your Teeth?
Dental health May 29, 2023
Chiropractic Laser Therapy: A Beacon of Hope for Chronic Pain Sufferers
Chiropractic Laser Therapy: A Beacon of Hope for Chronic Pain Sufferers
Therapies May 29, 2023

You Might also Like

MRI sedation options
Global Healthcare

MRI Sedation Options: What You Should Know Before Screening

May 17, 2023
medicines from nature
Global Healthcare

What is the Process of Creating Medicine from Nature?

May 2, 2023
varicose veins treatments
Health

Choosing the Right Treatment Option for Varicose Veins

May 2, 2023
wrong-site surgery
Policy & Law

What Are Wrong-Site Surgeries and How Do They Occur?

April 27, 2023
//

We influence million of users and is the most authentic source of information on healthcare business and technology news.

Quick Links

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Follow US

© 2008-2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?