By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Georgia’s Proposed Telemedicine Rule
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > eHealth > Georgia’s Proposed Telemedicine Rule
eHealth

Georgia’s Proposed Telemedicine Rule

rdowney14
rdowney14
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

Last Thursday, the Georgia Composite Medical Board took up its proposed telemedicine rule, one that would definitely limit telemedicine in that state.

As written, it would stifle the use of the technology by nurse practitioners and physician assistants because it would require that a patient be seen or examined by a physician in person or via electronic means before a NP or PA could provide care.

Frankly, when I first read about this rule, I thought ‘They can’t be serious!’  And in fact, there was a huge outcry against it.

Last Thursday, the Georgia Composite Medical Board took up its proposed telemedicine rule, one that would definitely limit telemedicine in that state.

More Read

Cybersecurity in Healthcare: What’s Working?
How Could AI Help Your Practice Evolve?
Positive Client Survey Results for a Russian Maternal mHealth Program
Is Design Important in Healthcare?
Google’s Plan to Take the Healthcare Industry By Storm

As written, it would stifle the use of the technology by nurse practitioners and physician assistants because it would require that a patient be seen or examined by a physician in person or via electronic means before a NP or PA could provide care.

Frankly, when I first read about this rule, I thought ‘They can’t be serious!’  And in fact, there was a huge outcry against it.

Time to step back for a little background on the pecking order of practitioners.  Physician assistants have supervising physicians.  New patients who see a PA actually establish the doctor-patient relationship with the PA’s supervising physician.  So requiring a patient to first see a physician in person or via videoconferencing before they have the encounter with the PA via telemedicine is a step backward.  Also, nurse practitioners in most states (Georgia may be different) work in collaboration with physicians; they are not supervised.  So the rule threatened to usurp the limited autonomy that an NP has and once again put the physician in charge.

The explanation for the rule from the board’s medical director, a physician, was to ensure that mid-level practitioners are supervised by physicians familiar with telemedicine technology.  So for patient protection, care and quality, in a time when there is a shortage of doctors, the board was going to throw up a barrier that would limit access to healthcare.  Huh?!?!? And the Georgia Nurses Association and consumer advocate orgainizations had basically the same reaction.

In timely fashion, Kaiser Health News published an article written by Christine Vestal, titled “In Many Communities, Nurse Practitioners Fill an Important Void.”  The story focuses on the Central Virginia Community Health Center in Buckingham County where four physicians would be overwhelmed by the 200 patients who show up every day, were it not for the help of nurse practitioners.  There are roughly 5,800 U.S. communities that don’t have enough primary care doctors.  So a telemedicine rule that further limits access to healthcare would aggravate the situation – especially when the new federal healthcare law extends insurance coverage in 2014 to 30 million more people.

In their minds, board members probably thought they were acting in good faith because they were only talking among themselves.  I’m sure they were not expecting the firestorm of reaction the proposed rule created.  Wisely, the board voted last Thursday to send the rule back to the Rules Committee to consider the comments received.  Executive Director LaSharn Hughes expects it to be on the rules agenda in January where, if the board has any sense, it will be quietly laid to rest.

TAGGED:telehealth
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

a woman walking on the hallway
6 Easy Healthcare Ways to Sit Less and Move More Every Day
Health
September 9, 2025
Clinical Expertise
Healthcare at a Crossroads: Why Leadership Matters More Than Ever
Global Healthcare
September 9, 2025
travel nurse in north carolina
Balancing Speed and Scope: Choosing the Nursing Degree That Fits Your Goals
Nursing
September 1, 2025
intimacy
How to Keep Intimacy Comfortable as You Age
Relationship and Lifestyle Senior Care
September 1, 2025

You Might also Like

Image
Medical Records

Whats Stopping Cloud Based-EHR Adoption?

June 22, 2014

Patient History Doesn’t Have to be Complicated Anymore

April 1, 2013

Engagement is the Next Frontier for Connected Health

January 24, 2013
Image
eHealthMedical Innovations

Top 10 Quotes From Harvard’s First Forum On Healthcare Innovation

July 22, 2013
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?