By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Georgia’s Proposed Telemedicine Rule
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > eHealth > Georgia’s Proposed Telemedicine Rule
eHealth

Georgia’s Proposed Telemedicine Rule

rdowney14
rdowney14
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

Last Thursday, the Georgia Composite Medical Board took up its proposed telemedicine rule, one that would definitely limit telemedicine in that state.

As written, it would stifle the use of the technology by nurse practitioners and physician assistants because it would require that a patient be seen or examined by a physician in person or via electronic means before a NP or PA could provide care.

Frankly, when I first read about this rule, I thought ‘They can’t be serious!’  And in fact, there was a huge outcry against it.

Last Thursday, the Georgia Composite Medical Board took up its proposed telemedicine rule, one that would definitely limit telemedicine in that state.

More Read

Telehealth
Will Medicare Cover Telehealth?
Do Teens Really Prefer Phone Calls?
Clinical Trial Engagement Apps Leverage Social, Rewards, Predictive Analytics
Secure Physician Network: Brainstorming for Cures [PODCAST]
Making a Physician Website ADA-Compliant Can Increase Your Bottom Line

As written, it would stifle the use of the technology by nurse practitioners and physician assistants because it would require that a patient be seen or examined by a physician in person or via electronic means before a NP or PA could provide care.

Frankly, when I first read about this rule, I thought ‘They can’t be serious!’  And in fact, there was a huge outcry against it.

Time to step back for a little background on the pecking order of practitioners.  Physician assistants have supervising physicians.  New patients who see a PA actually establish the doctor-patient relationship with the PA’s supervising physician.  So requiring a patient to first see a physician in person or via videoconferencing before they have the encounter with the PA via telemedicine is a step backward.  Also, nurse practitioners in most states (Georgia may be different) work in collaboration with physicians; they are not supervised.  So the rule threatened to usurp the limited autonomy that an NP has and once again put the physician in charge.

The explanation for the rule from the board’s medical director, a physician, was to ensure that mid-level practitioners are supervised by physicians familiar with telemedicine technology.  So for patient protection, care and quality, in a time when there is a shortage of doctors, the board was going to throw up a barrier that would limit access to healthcare.  Huh?!?!? And the Georgia Nurses Association and consumer advocate orgainizations had basically the same reaction.

In timely fashion, Kaiser Health News published an article written by Christine Vestal, titled “In Many Communities, Nurse Practitioners Fill an Important Void.”  The story focuses on the Central Virginia Community Health Center in Buckingham County where four physicians would be overwhelmed by the 200 patients who show up every day, were it not for the help of nurse practitioners.  There are roughly 5,800 U.S. communities that don’t have enough primary care doctors.  So a telemedicine rule that further limits access to healthcare would aggravate the situation – especially when the new federal healthcare law extends insurance coverage in 2014 to 30 million more people.

In their minds, board members probably thought they were acting in good faith because they were only talking among themselves.  I’m sure they were not expecting the firestorm of reaction the proposed rule created.  Wisely, the board voted last Thursday to send the rule back to the Rules Committee to consider the comments received.  Executive Director LaSharn Hughes expects it to be on the rules agenda in January where, if the board has any sense, it will be quietly laid to rest.

TAGGED:telehealth
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Epidemiological Health Benefits
Personal and Epidemiological Health Benefits of Blood Pressure Management
Health
October 13, 2025
Traumatic Brain Injuries
Understanding Traumatic Brain Injuries: What Families Need to Know
Policy & Law
October 10, 2025
Remote Monitoring touchpoints
Remote Monitoring Touchpoints Patients Will Actually Follow
Technology
October 9, 2025
dental care
Importance of Good Dental Care for Health and Confidence
Dental health Specialties
October 2, 2025

You Might also Like

Telehealth Treatment, Not Telemedicine

August 14, 2012
digital health
eHealthMobile HealthSocial Media

Are Insurance Providers Buying Into Digital Health? Audax Health Is Making It Happen

October 11, 2013
Image
Social Media

What Healthcare Marketers Need To Know About Pinterest’s Revised Terms of Service

April 6, 2012

Make Your Blog Your Brand’s Patient Ed HQ

December 28, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?