OIG Clears the Path for Physician Incentives

January 9, 2013
64 Views

For health care reform to succeed (and for the nation to achieve fiscal balance) hospitals must shift their focus away from maximizing volume and reimbursement to improving quality and reducing cost. But change like this is hard, especially when it necessitates changes in the behavior of specialist physicians.

For health care reform to succeed (and for the nation to achieve fiscal balance) hospitals must shift their focus away from maximizing volume and reimbursement to improving quality and reducing cost. But change like this is hard, especially when it necessitates changes in the behavior of specialist physicians.

That’s why I’m pleased that the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has determined that a hospital is allowed to offer bonuses to a cardiology group for reducing costs, improving quality, and increasing employee and patient satisfaction. There’s always a risk that financial incentives may be used for undesirable or fraudulent purposes but to me the risks are worth it in order to get the systemic change that’s so needed. The more that hospitals and physicians feel free to experiment with different, creative approaches without the fear of being imprisoned or fined the better.

In this particular example the 60 percent of the bonus is for cost reduction, 30 percent for quality improvement, and 5 each for employee and patient satisfaction. In a perfect world I’d like to see more weight on patient satisfaction but I do worry that if the number were too high it might lead to trouble, e.g., waiving co-pays the way car dealers used to give out free oil changes to people who let them fill out their consumer satisfaction survey.

In case anyone’s worried that OIG is getting soft, they did include some tough language in the opinion:

“Like any payment arrangement between a hospital and physicians who refer business to the hospital, payments purportedly intended to encourage quality improvements and cost savings might be misused by unscrupulous parties to induce limitations or reductions in care or to disguise kickbacks for federal healthcare program referrals.”

 

You may be interested

Where Is The Balance? Pushing Back Against Consumer Health Tech
eHealth
3 views
eHealth
3 views

Where Is The Balance? Pushing Back Against Consumer Health Tech

Larry Alton - August 18, 2017

When Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz glibly remarked that Americans struggling to afford insurance should choose between that and their smartphones,…

What to Look for in Patient Solutions Software
eHealth
365 views
eHealth
365 views

What to Look for in Patient Solutions Software

Robert Cordray - August 17, 2017

The medical sector is one area where technology has had a significant impact, largely by providing tools that simplify many…

Can Natural Remedies Like RediCalm Decrease Stress and Anxiety?
Wellness
2 views
Wellness
2 views

Can Natural Remedies Like RediCalm Decrease Stress and Anxiety?

Ryan Kh - August 16, 2017

According to research from the National Institute of Mental Health, anxiety disorders are the most common mental illness in the…