By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    Medical device classification and development strategies
    Medical device classification and development strategies
    April 5, 2023
    varicose veins
    Varicose Veins Prevention: 3 Lifestyle Changes to Make Right Now
    May 1, 2022
    Things You Should Know Before Buying Golden Teacher Mushrooms Spores
    Things You Should Know Before Buying Golden Teacher Mushrooms Spores
    September 15, 2022
    Latest News
    Beyond Nutrition: Everyday Foods That Support Whole-Body Health
    June 15, 2025
    The Wide-Ranging Benefits of Magnesium Supplements
    June 11, 2025
    The Best Home Remedies for Migraines
    June 5, 2025
    The Hidden Impact Of Stress On Your Body’s Alignment And Balance
    May 22, 2025
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Aaron Carroll Defends Retail Clinics
    December 13, 2011
    Health Wonk Review – Opening Day Edition
    September 11, 2017
    Cigarette Warning Labels May Go Up in Smoke
    January 9, 2012
    Latest News
    Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
    July 6, 2025
    Top HIPAA-Compliant Messaging Apps for Healthcare Teams
    June 25, 2025
    When Healthcare Ends, the Legal Process Begins: What Families Should Know About Probate and Medical Estates
    June 20, 2025
    Preventing Contamination In Healthcare Facilities Starts With Hygiene
    June 15, 2025
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Pregnancy and Autonomy – Just Whose Body is it Anyway?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Pregnancy and Autonomy – Just Whose Body is it Anyway?
Policy & Law

Pregnancy and Autonomy – Just Whose Body is it Anyway?

psalber
psalber
Share
7 Min Read
Image
SHARE

 

                                                         Image

 

 

More Read

importance of healthcare worker wellness
4 Ways Healthcare Workers Can Care for Themselves
How Medicare Advantage Works
Meaningful Use, VNAs, and Addressing the Challenges Each Present
7 Ways Of Becoming A Good Mental Health Professional
8 Of The Most Bizarre Medical Malpractice Cases Out There

                                                         Image

 

Julie D. Cantor, MD, JD, Adjunct faculty, UCLA, School of Law

Julie Cantor, MD, JD, published a disturbing article on “Court-Ordered Care” in the June 14, 2012 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine raising the important issue of maternal autonomy.  She begins the piece with a case example of a woman, Samantha Burton, who was admitted to Tallahassee Memorial Hospital by her obstetrician after her membranes ruptured at 25 weeks of gestation.  The doctor’s prescription was inpatient bed rest for the duration of the pregnancy.

The patient decided she could not stay in the hospital, on bed rest, for three months because she had two young children at home to care for and her job to consider.  She tried to leave the hospital against her doctor’s advice, but she was physically prevented from doing so.

Then, the hospital started the process of getting a court order to keep her in the hospital.  Burton, who couldn’t leave the hospital, had to  testify by phone without guidance from counsel.  Her obstetrician, according to the NEJM article, became “the unborn child’s attending physician.” (Hmmm…I thought he was Samantha Burton’s doctor.)

The day after the hearing, the judge in the case gave the hospital and its staff permission to “administer any care they deemed necessary to preserve the fetus’s life and health.”  Burton’s request to change hospitals was denied and she was ordered to comply with the bed rest order.  Within days, not surprisingly, Burton delivered a dead fetus by C-section.

Trying to strive for a live birth of a 25 week fetus, in this case, put the mom at risk for complications including intrauterine infection, deep venous thrombosis, muscle wasting, and other complications of prolonged bed rest.  Further, a prolonged hospitalization had potential adverse impacts on the woman’s other two children who would be deprived of their mother’s care and family income if the absence resulted in loss of wages or permanent loss of her job.  Further it is relevant that prolonged bed rest has never been shown that to improve outcomes in cases like this.  In fact, there is published evidence that the practice might actually be harmful.

This case raises the question: Do “the rights” of an unborn fetus really trump everything else in the mother’s life, including her own health?  Just whose body is it anyway?  “Why,” as Dr. Cantor writes, “should pregnancy diminish a competent adult woman’s right to refuse care?”

According to some respected medical ethicists, it probably does not. Beneficence, the doctor’s obligation  to prevent harm, must be balanced with autonomy.  Here are some definitions of these fundamental principles of medical ethics from University of California San Francisco’s School of Medicine:

“Autonomy is the ‘personal rule of the self that is free from both controlling interferences by others and from personal limitations that prevent meaningful choice.’  Autonomous individuals act intentionally, with understanding, and without controlling influences…Examples of promoting autonomous behavior [include] presenting all treatment options to a patient, explaining risks in terms that a patient understands, ensuring that a patient understands the risks and agrees to all procedures before going into surgery.”

Beneficence is the physician’s

“obligation to 1) prevent and remove harms, and 2) weigh and balance possible benefits against possible risks of an action. Beneficence can also include protecting and defending the rights of others, rescuing persons who are in danger, and helping individuals with disabilities…Examples of beneficent actions [include] resuscitating a drowning victim, providing vaccinations for the general population, encouraging a patient to quit smoking and start an exercise program, talking to the community about STD prevention.”

Problems arise when a patient’s autonomous decision conflicts with the physician’s view of beneficence.  An example is when a patient with heart disease chooses to continue smoking despite the physician’s best effort to convince the patient to quit.  What should the doctor  do?  We are offered this guidance:

“In these situations the autonomous choice of the patient conflicts with the physician’s duty of beneficence and following each ethical principle would lead to different actions. As long as the patient meets the criteria for making an autonomous choice (the patient understands the decision at hand and is not basing the decision on delusional ideas), then the physician should respect the patient’s decisions even while trying to convince the patient otherwise.”

Dr. Cantor provides some additional considerations with these remarks:

“Citizens have no legal duty to use their  bodies to save one another; even parents have no legal duty to their children.  It follows, then, that ‘a fetus cannot have rights in this respect superior to those of a person who has already been born.’”

Indeed, she she goes on to point out that forced care creates a slippery slope where we could end up arresting and jailing women who drink or smoke during pregnancy to protect their fetuses from injurious exposures.  Come on folks, where should we draw the line?

I believe our fallback needs to be that these are highly personal and difficult decisions that should be guided by clinicians.  We can offer information, recommendations, our personal opinion, and psychological support to patients facing these tough choices.  But we cannot and we should not make these decisions for them. Forced care, particularly court-ordered care that violates the rights of a pregnant woman, is just plain bad medicine.

As Dr. Cantor concludes, “Forced interventions undermine the liberty, privacy and equality of pregnant women…they betray foundational legal principles of our free society and the endanger the liberty of us all.”

photo: pio3 /shutterstock

TAGGED:patient rightspregnancy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

9 Lifestyle Tweaks That Can Add Years to Your Life
9 Healthcare Lifestyle Tweaks That can Add Years to Your Life
lifestyle
July 11, 2025
car accident lawsuit
Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
Policy & Law
July 6, 2025
women dental care
What Is a Smile Makeover and How Much Does It Cost?
Dental health
June 30, 2025
HIPAA-Compliant Messaging Apps
Top HIPAA-Compliant Messaging Apps for Healthcare Teams
Global Healthcare Policy & Law Technology
June 25, 2025

You Might also Like

Why ACOs Might Not Make an Impact (transcript)

April 11, 2011
BusinessNewsPolicy & Law

Is Easy-to-Understand Health Insurance Even Possible?

December 5, 2011

VIVUS, Inc., Presses the Case for Obesity Drug Qnexa, Market Success

October 18, 2011
medication heart
BusinessFinanceHospital AdministrationPolicy & Law

4 Reasons Doctors Are Taking a Fresh Look at In-Office Dispensing

January 9, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?