By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Are Electronic Medical Records Really Causing a Crisis?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > Hospital Administration > Are Electronic Medical Records Really Causing a Crisis?
BusinesseHealthHospital AdministrationMedical RecordsPublic Health

Are Electronic Medical Records Really Causing a Crisis?

Tim_Edlund
Tim_Edlund
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

bigstock-Messy-Papers-131269When someone dies of a treatable illness, fingers start pointing.

Contents
  • The Problem with Many EMR’s
  • Electronic Medical Records: Format Matters

bigstock-Messy-Papers-131269When someone dies of a treatable illness, fingers start pointing. In the October 13, 2014 New York Times article, “With Electronic Medical Records, Doctors Read When They Should Talk,” Abigail Zuger notes that when a medical professional does not take the time to collect a patient’s history and medical records, the patient may receive a tragic misdiagnosis. The role of computerized medical records, and particularly the challenge of obtaining relevant details from vast amounts of narrative format, is central in the discussion.

The Problem with Many EMR’s

Ok, so we have a very comprehensive electronic medical record for this patient that includes information critical to diagnosis and the treatment plan.  Those records also include a lot of detail that isn’t relevant along with a fair bit of duplication. 

While taking the time to read an entire patient file may seem logical at face value (after-all we are talking about a sick patient here), the realities of the healthcare environment often make that impossible.  

More Read

Image
Investment in Healthcare IT is on the Rise – Are We Ready for Change?
The Top 7 Benefits of External IROs
Boomer Health: Top 8 Best Health Digital Resources for Boomers
Engage with Grace: Thanksgivukkah Edition
Healthcare Is Part of Our Supply Chain: The Boeing Company

Zuger explains, “We are in the middle of a simmering crisis in medical data management. Like computer servers everywhere, hospital servers store great masses of trivia mixed with valuable information and gross misinformation, all cut and pasted and endlessly reiterated.” She later points out, “Ask the doctor to read, and the doctor will scan, skip, elide, omit and often forget.”

There is no argument that comprehensive documentation is important.  Too much documentation that cannot be effectively searched and segmented for the situation at hand, however, quickly becomes a liability. Taking the time to wade through the entire patient record looking for key details gives doctors less time to spend with their patients.  

Zuger claims that, “…Even if all the redundant clinical information sitting on hospital servers everywhere were error-free, and even if excellent software made it all reasonably accessible, doctors and nurses still shouldn’t be spending their time reading.”

bigstock-Doctor-Talking-To-Patient-42055306The solution that some physicians choose to the too-much-information problem is to ask the patient rather than read the file. That solution isn’t perfect either.  Given multiple providers and treatment facilities, patients usually become frustrated after they have been asked the same question for the 3rd or 4th time. 

Zuger makes some good points. Overall, however, not reading or relying too much on the patient for information isn’t practical either.  Patients will leave out important facts.  Frustrating patients with repetitive questions may increase their stress and negatively impact their confidence in the care team that seems unable to share and retain key details about their condition.

Electronic Medical Records: Format Matters

A big part of this problem is not the fact that records have been computerized, but that records are poorly formatted and organized.  Just taking paper narrative reports – blocks of text in the form of referral narratives, discharge summaries, lab and consultant reports, etc. – is still a “paper system”.  The information has been captured digitally but it is in the same format designed for consumption on paper. 

Personally, I can scan and read narrative text faster on paper than I can on computer screens.  That doesn’t mean, however, I’d prefer to go back to paper charts.

EMR software that just digitizes narrative reports from paper get us only part of the way to a better solution.  Full text search on narrative documents is a well-established technology good EMR’s are already offering.  I can search for “allergies” and find that word (and similar word forms) where it appears in text content. 

That technology on its own, however, only supports finding what the clinician knows to search for.  It doesn’t make the process of scanning text to check for the unexpected (and critical) any easier.  Text searching alone may also obfuscate key context – is the allergy new, associated with a specific scenario, etc..  Did that come up in my search results?

A second component of effective medical records is simply their format.  Non-narrative “synoptic” report formats – have been shown to result in more complete reporting with fewer errors [1, 2].  These reports are based on structured data and templates.  They are preferred by most report readers because they result in less volume than narrative formats, without losing detail.  

The synoptic format allows physicians to see all the necessary data listed clearly in a compressed format.  The equivalent details in narrative format often require 5 to 6 times the screen volume.  Where comments are critical to interpretation of synoptic values, a summary section can be easily incorporated – which may even further reduce the volume of the report that must be reviewed for some readers.

Synoptic Reports

Synoptic reports aren’t meant to replace good, old-fashioned conversations with patients. They take the burden out of the process of reviewing patient records by reducing volume without reducing detail, and they achieve this while improving accuracy and completeness compared with narrative formats.

TAGGED:EMR
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

a woman walking on the hallway
6 Easy Healthcare Ways to Sit Less and Move More Every Day
Health
September 9, 2025
Clinical Expertise
Healthcare at a Crossroads: Why Leadership Matters More Than Ever
Global Healthcare
September 9, 2025
travel nurse in north carolina
Balancing Speed and Scope: Choosing the Nursing Degree That Fits Your Goals
Nursing
September 1, 2025
intimacy
How to Keep Intimacy Comfortable as You Age
Relationship and Lifestyle Senior Care
September 1, 2025

You Might also Like

ACO Update: A Third Horse Enters the Race

November 18, 2011
Business

Reframing the Question of Doctor Frustration

August 7, 2014
vc investments in healthcare
BusinessFinance

VCs Are Investing Heavily in Healthcare

August 29, 2014
Image
BusinessWellness

End-of-Life Decisions

March 19, 2013
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?