By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    medicare part d benefits
    Everything that You Need to Know About Medicare Part D
    August 15, 2022
    Best Ways to Boost Your Immune System this Winter
    Best Ways to Boost Your Immune System this Winter
    November 15, 2022
    back pain issues
    Ways to Treat Constant Back Pain
    August 21, 2023
    Latest News
    How Probate Planning Shapes the Future of Your Estate and Family Care
    July 17, 2025
    Beyond Nutrition: Everyday Foods That Support Whole-Body Health
    June 15, 2025
    The Wide-Ranging Benefits of Magnesium Supplements
    June 11, 2025
    The Best Home Remedies for Migraines
    June 5, 2025
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    More On Wellness Programs To Improve Health and Reduce Costs
    January 25, 2012
    Privatizing Social Security and Medicare: Who Can Defuse Political Dynamite?
    June 12, 2011
    Study: Risk of Death in Elderly Patients with Dementia Doubled with Some Antipsychotic Medications
    February 26, 2012
    Latest News
    How IT and Marketing Teams Can Collaborate to Protect Patient Trust
    July 17, 2025
    How Health Choices and Legal Actions Intersect After an Injury
    July 17, 2025
    How communities and healthcare providers can address slip and fall injuries with legal awareness
    July 17, 2025
    Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
    July 6, 2025
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Consumer-Driven HealthCare vs Third Party Payer
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Consumer-Driven HealthCare vs Third Party Payer
Policy & Law

Consumer-Driven HealthCare vs Third Party Payer

JohnCGoodman
JohnCGoodman
Share
7 Min Read
SHARE

A reporter who is new to the health care wars contacted me the other day. She already had a pretty good idea of the liberal point of view — expand government — and wanted the conservative viewpoint. She assumed that meant “privatization.” She asked several questions, such as:

What do you think privatization of the entire health care system would do to fix it? Why does this work better than the opposite, a universal system run by the government?

I’m afraid I disappointed her by responding with this:

A reporter who is new to the health care wars contacted me the other day. She already had a pretty good idea of the liberal point of view — expand government — and wanted the conservative viewpoint. She assumed that meant “privatization.” She asked several questions, such as:

More Read

training for EHR
EHR Training Guidelines for Healthcare Organizations
Workplace Clinics: All good
The Revolutionary Advent Of Precision Medicine In Cancer Treatment
4 Ways Health Care Is Different from Other Industries
Cervical Cancer Misdiagnosis – A Deadly Mistake

What do you think privatization of the entire health care system would do to fix it? Why does this work better than the opposite, a universal system run by the government?

I’m afraid I disappointed her by responding with this:

Calling what I have been advocating “privatization” is too simplistic. That is not descriptive at all. Let me explain.

My contention is that the core problem in health care is third-party payment — having other people pay the bills on our behalf. It matters some (but not much) if that third-party payer (TPP) is public or private. In fact virtually all the “public” payers contract out to private insurers for the administration of the programs.

TPPs may be private insurers, employers, or government agencies. They all have the same insidious effects: (1.) They add administrative costs that take away from patient care. (2.) They substitute their judgment for ours even though they don’t know us and really don’t much care about OUR needs, values, priorities, resources, family structure, or emotional condition.

This is doubly ironic since every penny they spend on our healthcare comes from us. There is simply no other source. It is our money in the form of premiums, taxes, or lost wages. It is supposed to be spent for our benefit.

We have been trying to get this system of third-party payment to work for 50 years. Sometimes the government is dominant, other times, employers, other times private insurers. Many billions of dollars have been spent trying to tweak it — rate setting, managed care, contract negotiations, DRGs, universal health programs, Medicaid expansion, and on and on and on. None of it has worked. We have instead a system that is inefficient, bureaucratic, inconvenient, unaccountable, and waaaay too expensive.

The Affordable Care Act is just more of the same — maybe this time if we have this requirement and that mandate and these regulations we’ll be able to get everything to work out just right. It is a fantasy. Replacing HMOs with ACOs will do nothing to fix the system. Mandating that people must buy lousy insurance does not improve anything.

We need real reform. We now have an inkling of what WILL work in the form of “consumer driven health care.” HSAs are just a baby step in the right direction, but so far the evidence is overwhelming that putting the money in the hands of the consumer/patient creates the change we need. People get the services they want at a price they think provides value.

But the so-called “policy community” hates this idea because it disempowers them. Allowing people to control their own money means that policy makers lose control.

Hope this helps.

YIKES! She said, “This is an interesting option that I haven’t really heard!” And asked some follow-up questions centered around the idea that health insurance would be banished. She asked whether the government would be involved at all, how such an idea would hold down costs, and how the poor would fare.

I replied:

Well, not quite that, either.

Insurance is different than third-party payment. Insurance is a two-party contract, like your auto insurance. You pay the premium, and the insurer pays you when something bad happens. That is fine, but different people will choose different levels of coverage, again depending on their own circumstances. It would be there for the kinds of high cost conditions you cite.

Of course the government should be involved. It needs to regulate the insurance companies to make sure they will pay the promised benefits.

Government is also involved in setting tax policy. Current tax law gives an unlimited tax break to employer-sponsored plans, but none at all to people who buy their own coverage. This should be equalized.

Lower income people can be subsidized with vouchers. I would suggest a sliding scale voucher based on income. This would be another role for government.

On cost containment, consumer driven plans (like HSAs) are the only approach that has been proven to hold down costs. Researchers at the Rand Corporation found they lower costs by 30%.

But, yes, as much as possible there should be direct payment of services. This completely eliminates administrative waste for both payers and providers.

And, btw, Medicare should also be reformed to include HSAs. The Feds could continue to provide the back-up insurance, but Parts A and B would be merged into a single program with an across the board deductible with 100% coverage after that. The deductible would be set wherever the actuaries say is appropriate to keep in revenue neutral — probably in the $2,000 to $3,000 range. People would not have to buy Medigap coverage any longer.

Oy gavalt! It’s so confusing. Methinks she won’t have any more questions, at least not for me.

TAGGED:health reformthird party payer
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Grounded Healing: A Natural Ally for Sustainable Healthcare Systems
How IT and Marketing Teams Can Collaborate to Protect Patient Trust
Global Healthcare Policy & Law
July 17, 2025
paramedics in surgical gloves and masks
How Health Choices and Legal Actions Intersect After an Injury
Health care
July 16, 2025
a woman giving a key
How Probate Planning Shapes the Future of Your Estate and Family Care
Health
July 16, 2025
a woman with kinesio tapes on her back arm
How communities and healthcare providers can address slip and fall injuries with legal awareness
Health care
July 16, 2025

You Might also Like

Health carePublic Health

Private Health Insurance Approach Inspires International Changes

September 30, 2019
Health carePolicy & LawPublic Health

NHS Draws Ire of Public Over Cancer Drug Rationing

August 25, 2017
Medical Education

What is Biomedical & Health Informatics?

November 9, 2011
projected nursing shortages
BusinessHealth ReformHospital AdministrationMedical EducationPublic Health

Exploring the Spectrum: An In-Depth Look at the Many Sides of Nursing [INFOGRAPHIC]

May 7, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?