By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Echocardiographic in General Population Not Effective in Reducing Death/Disease
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > Finance > Echocardiographic in General Population Not Effective in Reducing Death/Disease
DiagnosticsFinanceHealth ReformPolicy & LawSpecialties

Echocardiographic in General Population Not Effective in Reducing Death/Disease

Anthony Cirillo
Anthony Cirillo
Share
0 Min Read
echocardiographic
SHARE
echocardiographic
echocardiographic
Before the test, question the tester.

A study in Norway suggests echocardiographic screening in the general public for structural and valvular heart disease was not associated with benefit for reducing the risk of death, myocardial infarction (heart attack) or stroke, according to a report published by JAMA Internal Medicine, a JAMA Network publication.

Because of the low prevalence of structural heart disease in the general population, echocardiography has traditionally not been considered justified in low-risk individuals, although echocardiography is recommended for screening asymptomatic individuals with a family history of sudden death or hereditary diseases affecting the heart, according to the study background.

Haakon Lindekleiv, M.D., Ph.D., of the University of Tromsø, Norway, and colleagues examined whether echocardiographic screening in the general population improved long-term survival or reduced the risk of cardiovascular disease in a randomized clinical study.

Researchers studied 6,861 middle-aged participants (3,272 in a screening group and 3,589 in a control group). In the screening group, 290 participants (8.9 percent) underwent follow-up examinations because of abnormal findings and cardiac or valvular pathologic conditions were verified in 249 participants (7.6 percent).

More Read

Knee arthroscopy charges and payments
Insurers’ payments vary more than hospital charges, data shows
Inside IT Strategies – Moving Radiology Workflows to the Cloud
Reducing Documentation Costs for Physician Practices
Loss Of Health Insurance and Medications Cited as Potential Motive For Shootings
Inattentional Blindness and the Invisible Gorilla Study: Are Radiologists at Risk?

“Among the screening group, the prevalence of structural heart and valvular disease was 7.6 percent, and the most common finding was valvular disease. However, diagnosing asymptomatic disease is useful only if it can lead to clinical action that slows or stops progression of disease. Although sclerosis of the aortic and mitral valves has been associated with a substantial increased risk of cardiovascular disease, we did not find that early diagnosis of valvular disease in the general population translated into reduced risk of death or cardiovascular events,” the study notes.

During 15 years of follow-up, 880 people (26.9 percent) in the screening group died and 989 people (27.6 percent) in the control group died.

‘This supports existing guidelines that echocardiography is not recommended for cardiovascular risk assessment in asymptomatic adults,” the study concludes. “Although our results were negative, we believe that they are of clinical importance because they may contribute to reducing the overuse of echocardiography.”

The last quote was the one worth noting. Over-testing in this country is part of the reason we have a huge health care cost problem. This will not change during health reform because frankly the providers who carry out these tests, only in rare circumstances, have a financial incentive not to hold back testing.

But that costs you and me money in increased insurance premiums.
That is not to say you should not have needed testing. But you should conduct your own research and question every aspect of your care. Understand the why! Ask more questions.

TAGGED:echocardiographic screening
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

The Invisible Bond Between Physical and Emotional Pain
The Invisible Bond Between Physical and Emotional Pain
Mental Health Wellness
June 16, 2026
photo of a woman with red hair holding a brown brush
How Long Does It Take to Recover from Hair Fall?
Fitness
June 12, 2026
a person putting a bandage on a woman s head
How a car accident can leave hidden injury patterns
Global Healthcare
June 12, 2026
emergency medical simulation with rescue team outdoors
How car accident injuries can reshape physical recovery and everyday health routines
Policy & Law
June 12, 2026

You Might also Like

Healthcare Reimbursement
BusinessFinanceHospital Administration

5 Trends in Healthcare Reimbursement

September 24, 2014

How to Help Teens with Depression

April 1, 2018
Health careUncategorized

How Can Healthcare Providers Better Support Black Mothers?

June 30, 2020

Does the Healthcare Industry Need to Revisit ‘Marketing 101’?

April 17, 2012
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?