By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    physical health
    5 Ways Playing Games Can Improve Neural and Physical Health
    September 9, 2022
    Reasons For Hair Loss and Its Treatment
    Reasons For Hair Loss and Its Treatment
    February 16, 2022
    healthcare organization
    5 Actionable Strategies For Healthcare Organizations
    August 15, 2022
    Latest News
    5 Reasons to Consider Drinking Sparkling Water
    June 8, 2023
    What Are the Different Categories of Medical Supplies?
    June 8, 2023
    Meal Delivery Services Can Promote Healthy Eating Habits
    June 8, 2023
    Getting Back in the Game: Sports Injuries Rehabilitation Tips
    May 31, 2023
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Baseball Caps, Flip Flops and Melanoma
    July 14, 2011
    Debunking Another Eco Scare
    August 20, 2011
    How 12 Million are Putting “The Big C” Behind Them
    September 21, 2011
    Latest News
    Transparency and Ethics in Medical Residency Placement
    June 8, 2023
    MRI Sedation Options: What You Should Know Before Screening
    May 17, 2023
    What is the Process of Creating Medicine from Nature?
    May 2, 2023
    Choosing the Right Treatment Option for Varicose Veins
    May 2, 2023
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Giving Power to the States, But at Whose Expense?
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Aa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Aa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > Giving Power to the States, But at Whose Expense?
Health ReformPolicy & Law

Giving Power to the States, But at Whose Expense?

Brad Wright
Last updated: 2015/03/06 at 9:00 AM
Brad Wright
Share
7 Min Read
state power and the ACA
SHARE

state power and the ACALike any good conservative proposal, the Burr-Hatch-Upton plan to replace the ACA puts an emphasis on devolving decisionmaking from the federal government to the states.

state power and the ACALike any good conservative proposal, the Burr-Hatch-Upton plan to replace the ACA puts an emphasis on devolving decisionmaking from the federal government to the states. As the proposal says: “States have a key role to play in expanding access to coverage and helping to lower costs.” I think this is a good place to remind everyone that the ACA established health insurance exchanges and the (now optional) Medicaid expansion at the state level. So, what does the GOP plan do differently? Well, for starters, I think it does more to harm individual liberty than the ACA.

Under the ACA, people have been understandably upset that they are being “forced” to buy health insurance coverage or pay a tax penalty. While it is true that many people would prefer not to pay a penalty or buy insurance, they should realize that they still have some choice in the matter. For example, they can choose to buy insurance OR pay a penalty. Then, if they choose to buy insurance they can choose which plan to purchase. By stark contrast, the GOP proposal would initially take away that choice. Specifically, the plan states:

“In the case of individuals who have a health tax credit, but who fail to make an affirmative choice in choosing a plan within a specified timeframe, states would be allowed to utilize default enrollment. In this case, states which choose to do so would be given the authority to designate several insurance plans as default options to which individuals who do not proactively choose a plan could be randomly assigned.”

More Read

benefits of urgent care

What Are the Advantages of Urgent Care Facilities?

Not Knowing About Comparative Negligence Can Worsen Your Medical Debt
The Role Addiction Plays in Increasing the Risk of Traffic Accidents
What Are Bioidentical Hormones Made With?
Cover Medical Costs of Child Dog Bites with Legal Specialists

Basically, they’re saying that if you don’t take action to get covered, and you qualify for a health tax credit, the state can randomly put you into a plan against your will. Realizing that this may be an unpopular position, the proposal then clarifies that if you don’t like the plan you’ve been assigned to, you can take action to switch to a different plan or opt-out of coverage altogether. But without at some point making an affirmative choice regarding health insurance, the GOP plan moves us from a world where you don’t get coverage and pay a tax penalty, to a world where your tax credit is used to help purchase coverage for you that you did not select and might not want. Is that really any better?

The proposal also suggests that we go back to segregating people with serious health conditions through an increased reliance on state high-risk pools. These high-risk pools were once the only way for those with extremely costly illnesses to get coverage. However, under the ACA, the requirement for insurers to offer anyone coverage without regard for pre-existing conditions has solved that problem. Now everyone can enter the risk pool and the costs are spread among a much larger group of people. On the whole, that’s a good thing, but the GOP proposal takes exception to the fact that this approach raises costs for the younger and healthier individuals in the risk pool. Instead, they want to identify those seriously ill people who are driving up costs for everyone else, remove them from the general risk pool, and restrict them to a state high-risk pool, where their costs will increase substantially. That’s seen as okay, because, after all, they’re the ones who are sick. Why should everyone else have to pay for them? To which I would respond: Because that’s precisely the way insurance was designed to work.

The proposal also says that “small businesses would be free…to band together to negotiate small business health plans…” I actually think that’s not a bad idea, although it is very similar to the small business health options program (SHOP) that currently exists under the ACA. So, once again, the things I seem to like best about the Burr-Hatch-Upton proposal are the things that are already law under the ACA.

Finally, the proposal “would give consumers the ability to shop for health plans across state lines while protecting the primacy of states regulating health insurance products.” This one’s more confusing than it seems. On the one hand, I like the idea of opening up the option of purchasing health insurance across state lines. After all, that means more competition, and more competition means lower prices, right? The trouble is that many people are already overwhelmed by the insurance options in their state alone. Imagine their consternation when their choices get multiplied by 50. The likely result is that they will decide even more on the basis of the monthly premium price, but that can have disastrous consequences when they learn that, say, they live in Alabama and all of their in-network providers are in California. It’s also more troubling for the insurance companies. Underwriting within one state is no easy task, but if you’re suddenly in a world where your actuaries have to figure out how many and what kinds of people from across the country will be enrolling in your plan, it can get complicated. This may result in some bet hedging by the actuaries that actually raises–rather than lowers–the price of an interstate policy.

So, there you have it. More power to the states, but at the expense of the people.

state power / shutterstock

TAGGED: ACA

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Brad Wright March 6, 2015
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article supreme court and the ACA The Supreme Court and the Subsidy in the Bathwater
Next Article Putting a New Spin on Healthcare Culture

Stay Connected

1.5k Followers Like
4.5k Followers Follow
2.8k Followers Pin
136k Subscribers Subscribe

Latest News

medical residency ethics
Transparency and Ethics in Medical Residency Placement
Medicare June 8, 2023
weight loss
From Pills To Procedures: A Comprehensive Guide To Medical Weight Loss
Weight Loss June 8, 2023
sparkling water health benefits
5 Reasons to Consider Drinking Sparkling Water
News June 8, 2023
skin allergy causes
What Are The Common Triggers Of Skin Allergy?
Allergy June 8, 2023

You Might also Like

medical residency ethics
Medicare

Transparency and Ethics in Medical Residency Placement

June 8, 2023
MRI sedation options
Global Healthcare

MRI Sedation Options: What You Should Know Before Screening

May 17, 2023
medicines from nature
Global Healthcare

What is the Process of Creating Medicine from Nature?

May 2, 2023
varicose veins treatments
Health

Choosing the Right Treatment Option for Varicose Veins

May 2, 2023
//

We influence million of users and is the most authentic source of information on healthcare business and technology news.

Quick Links

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Follow US

© 2008-2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?