By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    photo of hands with blue veins
    8 Proven Tips on Finding Difficult Veins
    November 12, 2021
    tips for getting over the pandemic blues
    4 Proven Ways to Get Over the Pandemic Blues
    February 22, 2022
    medical industry innovations
    How is CNC Machining Transforming the Medical Industry?
    June 2, 2022
    Latest News
    5 Reasons to Consider Drinking Sparkling Water
    June 8, 2023
    What Are the Different Categories of Medical Supplies?
    June 8, 2023
    Meal Delivery Services Can Promote Healthy Eating Habits
    June 8, 2023
    Getting Back in the Game: Sports Injuries Rehabilitation Tips
    May 31, 2023
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Medicare Now Provides Coverage for Obesity Treatment and Prevention
    December 3, 2011
    Mayo Clinic Video–Know Your Numbers Blood Pressure, Lipids and BMI
    January 5, 2012
    The Patient’s Checklist
    January 27, 2012
    Latest News
    Transparency and Ethics in Medical Residency Placement
    June 8, 2023
    MRI Sedation Options: What You Should Know Before Screening
    May 17, 2023
    What is the Process of Creating Medicine from Nature?
    May 2, 2023
    Choosing the Right Treatment Option for Varicose Veins
    May 2, 2023
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Play or Pay: The Triple Aim for 2015 and Beyond
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Aa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Aa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > Play or Pay: The Triple Aim for 2015 and Beyond
BusinessHealth ReformPolicy & Law

Play or Pay: The Triple Aim for 2015 and Beyond

Linda Ringquist
Last updated: 2014/06/16 at 8:11 AM
Linda Ringquist
Share
6 Min Read
Pay or Play
SHARE

Summary: What will you decide for your organization beginning 2015? Will you “play or pay”?

Contents
“Play” – “Play or Pay”“Play” – “Play or Pay”“Pay” – “Play or Pay”How will the government know if you are not “playing” by the rules?“Play or Pay” – Other Considerations

The “play or “pay” principle basically says that if employers with 50 or more full time employees don’t meet the minimum requirements of offering insurance coverage, they will pay very steep penalties. The provision will be phased in beginning in 2015. The “play or pay” principle is part of the PPACA, specifically under the provision of “shared responsibility”.

“Play” – “Play or Pay”

So, what are those minimum requirements?

Summary: What will you decide for your organization beginning 2015? Will you “play or pay”?

More Read

Types of Remote Access Solutions for Hospitals

Types of Remote Access Solutions for Hospitals

What Are the Advantages of Urgent Care Facilities?
Not Knowing About Comparative Negligence Can Worsen Your Medical Debt
The Role Addiction Plays in Increasing the Risk of Traffic Accidents
What Are the Benefits of Attending Medical Sales College?

The “play or “pay” principle basically says that if employers with 50 or more full time employees don’t meet the minimum requirements of offering insurance coverage, they will pay very steep penalties. The provision will be phased in beginning in 2015. The “play or pay” principle is part of the PPACA, specifically under the provision of “shared responsibility”.

“Play” – “Play or Pay”

So, what are those minimum requirements?

Pay or Play

Coverage

A full time employee for the purposes of the “play or pay” principle is an employee who works at least 30 hours, regardless of status as determined by the employer. This extends to part time and PRN employees who meet this criteria. Additionally, the plan must contain the essential health benefits as set forth by the US Department of Health and Human Services. It is important to note that these essential health benefits may change from time to time and therefore must be monitored closely.

2015: Employers must offer coverage to at least 70% of their full-time employees and their dependents (up to age26), providing they have at least 100 full-time employees.

2016: Employers must offer coverage to at least 95% of their full-time employees and their dependents (up to age 26), providing they have at least 50 full-time employees.

Value

In terms of the Employer Mandate, a.k.a. “play or pay”, insurance plans must provide value. Value, in this context, refers to an employer not only offering coverage, but coverage through a plan in which at least 60% of covered services (including deductibles, copays, and coinsurance). While this seems like a fairly simple calculation, it can be quite complex. The HHS website provides a value calculator to assist you in meeting this requirement, https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/Regulations-and-Guidance/Downloads/mv-calculator-methodology.pdf.

Affordability

The regulations are very clear on the affordability aspect of the “play or pay” principle. The threshold is 9.5% of an employees’ household income. The 9.5% can be calculated as a percentage of any of the following safe harbors:

PPACA

“Pay” – “Play or Pay”

We have talked about the “play” portion of “pay or play”. Now let’s focus on the “pay” aspect. Perhaps you are thinking that with all of this complexity, it may just be easier and cheaper to take the penalty and move on. Well, you may or may not know just how steep they can be:

Example: You have 1,000 employees

Scenario A: You don’t offer any coverage

  • Penalty: $2,000 *970 employees = 1,940,000
  • There is a slight discount in which the first 30 full time employees are exempt from the calculation
  • Do you have almost $2,000,000 that you can just throw away? Not many organizations do.

Scenario B: You provide coverage but it doesn’t meet either the affordability or value test.

  • Penalty: the lesser of:
  • $2,000 *970 employees = 1,940,000 or
  • $3,000 * the number of employees who purchase insurance on the exchange and are eligible for a subsidy, let’s assume 500. $3,000 * 500 = $1,500,000

How will the government know if you are not “playing” by the rules?

The trigger is going to be if any of your employees purchase insurance through the healthcare exchanges and are eligible for subsidies. One individual will trigger an audit of your organization in terms of coverage, value, and affordability.

“Play or Pay” – Other Considerations

There are other factors to consider when deciding whether to “play or pay”.

  • Can you quantify what you are currently spending to provide insurance to your employees?
  • Can you quantify the amount you are receiving as a tax deduction for providing insurance?
  • How will not providing insurance affect your employee’s taxes if they are no longer able to have premiums paid on a pre-tax basis?
  • Can you afford a mass exodus due to benefit cuts?
  • Are you easily able to calculate the 9.5% threshold for each employee?
  • Are you tracking all of the hours per employee including disability, paid time off, etc.?

Can you afford to “pay”? Can you afford these steep penalties? What are your thoughts on the employer mandate? What are your deciding factors when faced with the “play or pay” dilemma?

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Linda Ringquist June 16, 2014
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article The Leaked NY Times Report and Digital Marketing for Medical Devices Are Closely Related
Next Article Image The Geographic Divide: How Federalism Has Formalized Health Disparities

Stay Connected

1.5k Followers Like
4.5k Followers Follow
2.8k Followers Pin
136k Subscribers Subscribe

Latest News

medical residency ethics
Transparency and Ethics in Medical Residency Placement
Medicare June 8, 2023
weight loss
From Pills To Procedures: A Comprehensive Guide To Medical Weight Loss
Weight Loss June 8, 2023
sparkling water health benefits
5 Reasons to Consider Drinking Sparkling Water
News June 8, 2023
skin allergy causes
What Are The Common Triggers Of Skin Allergy?
Allergy June 8, 2023

You Might also Like

medical residency ethics
Medicare

Transparency and Ethics in Medical Residency Placement

June 8, 2023
MRI sedation options
Global Healthcare

MRI Sedation Options: What You Should Know Before Screening

May 17, 2023
medicines from nature
Global Healthcare

What is the Process of Creating Medicine from Nature?

May 2, 2023
varicose veins treatments
Health

Choosing the Right Treatment Option for Varicose Veins

May 2, 2023
//

We influence million of users and is the most authentic source of information on healthcare business and technology news.

Quick Links

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Follow US

© 2008-2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?