We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: The Specialty Drug Pricing Conundrum: Caps May Raise Costs, Not Lower Them
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > Hospital Administration > The Specialty Drug Pricing Conundrum: Caps May Raise Costs, Not Lower Them
BusinessHospital AdministrationPolicy & Law

The Specialty Drug Pricing Conundrum: Caps May Raise Costs, Not Lower Them

DavidEWilliams
DavidEWilliams
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE
Money, money, money

Money, money, money

Money, money, money

Money, money, money

It used to require hundreds of thousands of patients taking a drug to make it blockbuster. But over the last decade drug companies have figured out that they can get to $1 billion in product sales with much smaller populations. The key: sky-high prices.

The math is simple. A drug that goes for $1000 per year needs 1 million patients to get to the billion dollar mark, but if the price is $100,000 it takes just 10,000 patients. At $200,000 it’s 5000. Anyway, you get the idea.

You don’t see these dynamics in other fields, but healthcare is different. The two big drivers: third-party payment that shelters patients from the real costs of treatments and an aversion to talking about anything that could be construed as “rationing.”

In fact, as Kaiser Health News reports (States Limiting Patient Costs For High-Priced Drugs) public policy is moving even further away from using cost-sharing to constrain demand by limiting out-of-pocket payment amounts to as low as $100 per month. These policies will backfire as cost containment mechanisms because they will just end up boosting premiums.

Some other states are considering bills to require manufacturers to report their costs for high-priced drugs. That strikes me as pretty useless as well. If it’s a first step toward capping prices, that may discourage companies from moving forward with risky development programs for orphan diseases.

So what can be done, if anything? Well, a few things:

  • Use step therapy and similar programs to try less expensive treatments before defaulting toward the priciest. These programs are used today, but too often patients jump right to the high-priced specialty drug without seeing if something else would work
  • Shift the site of service for infused drugs away from hospital outpatient settings toward the home or physician’s office, which is much less costly
  • Encourage comparative effectiveness research and the adoption of quantitative measures such as Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to compare the efficacy of different treatments
  • Demand real-world, patient outcomes data from marketed products
  • Once a specialty (biologic) product has been on the market for several years and its patents have expired, regulate its price. This is a safer, more cost effective approach than encouraging so-called biosimilars

Image courtesy of Salvatore Vuono at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

 

TAGGED:drug costshealth costsHealthcarepharma
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: Clinical-trial operations editorial illustration combining healthcare and technology: country-specif
Clinical Study Operations Across Eastern European Research Markets
Health
October 31, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: A health-editorial scene of a first pain-management visit, bringing together attentive consultation,
What to Expect at Your First Pain Management Appointment
Therapies Wellness
October 29, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The core relationship is medication-only coverage versus coverage for a supervised clinical program.
Medical Weight Loss as a Workplace Benefit: The Questions I Would Want Asked
Weight Loss Wellness
October 29, 2026
Common Questions About Tirzepatide and Medical Monitoring -- AI-generated illustration
Common Questions About Tirzepatide and Medical Monitoring
Health
October 26, 2026

You Might also Like

Geotargeting, Medical PPC, Medical Practice Marketing
BusinesseHealth

5 Ways to Target Your Medical Practice’s Search Marketing Ads

March 9, 2014
Image
Policy & LawSocial Media

Social Media Laws – Really?

January 4, 2013
you need to know both how to prevent railway accidents and recover from them
Global HealthcareHealth care

Knowing How to Prevent and Recover from Railway Accidents

March 14, 2022

Are ACOs Just the Managed Care of the 90’s?

October 23, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?