We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Drug Risks Outweigh Benefits for Some Type 2 Diabetes Patients
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > News > Drug Risks Outweigh Benefits for Some Type 2 Diabetes Patients
NewsSpecialties

Drug Risks Outweigh Benefits for Some Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Liz Seegert
Liz Seegert
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

diabetes drugFor patients with type 2 diabetes – especially those over age 50 – the negative impact of side effects like weight gain and burdens like frequent insulin shots trumps the benefits of drugs, says a new study by the University of Michigan Health System, the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, and University College London.

diabetes drugFor patients with type 2 diabetes – especially those over age 50 – the negative impact of side effects like weight gain and burdens like frequent insulin shots trumps the benefits of drugs, says a new study by the University of Michigan Health System, the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, and University College London.

The findings, which appear in this week’s Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, show that for many, the benefits of taking diabetes medications are so small that they are outweighed by the minor hassles and risks.

These findings suggest that, contrary to current guidelines for type 2 diabetes that recommend intensifying treatment until a person’s blood sugar level reaches a certain goal, the overall benefit of taking a new medicine depends less on blood sugar and more on the hassles, safety and side effects of taking the treatment.

More Read

breast cancer testing
Angelina Jolie’s Decision: Do I Need to Be Tested?
Searching Online for Health Information
Project Diabetes 11.11.11 Ideas
2019 Brings New Science Behind the Skin
TIME Magazine Features Focused Ultrasound as One of This Year’s 50 Best Inventions

“For people with type 2 diabetes, the goal of managing blood sugar levels is to prevent associated diabetes complications, such as kidney, eye and heart disease, but it is essential to balance complication risks and treatment burdens when deciding how aggressively to treat blood sugars,” says lead author Sandeep Vijan M.D., M.S., professor of Internal Medicine at the U-M Medical School and research scientist at the Center for Clinical Management Research at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System.

“If you’re a patient with fairly low complication risks, but are experiencing symptoms from low blood sugar, gaining weight or find frequent insulin shots to be disruptive to your daily life, then the drugs are doing more harm than good. Prescribing medicine isn’t just about reducing risks of complications, but also about helping patients improve their quality of life.”

Vijan notes that for many patients, once moderate levels of glucose control are achieved, there is little additional benefit to intensive blood sugar treatment, but treatment costs, burdens and risks increase substantially. The study finds that the benefits of treatment decline with age and by age 75 the harms of most treatments are likely to outweigh any benefits.

The findings exclude the 15-20 percent of people with type 2 diabetes who have very high blood glucose levels (which are defined by what’s called an A1c test ) and need more aggressive treatment to manage the disease.

Individualized treatment recommendations determined by patients’ estimated risk of diabetes complications – influenced by their age and degree of blood glucose elevation – and considering the side effects and amount of safety data of the medication being considered, is a much better approach than focusing solely on glucose goals, the researchers argue.

“Drugs that lower blood sugar levels are extremely beneficial in some patients but offer almost no benefit for others. These results have major implications for the millions of people who are currently being told that they need to increase medication in order to achieve their ‘glucose goal,’” says senior author Rodney Hayward, M.D., professor of medicine in the U-M Medical School and senior research scientist at the Center for Clinical Management Research at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System.

“Current quality measures do not allow doctors and patients to make good decisions for each patient because they emphasize reaching targets instead of thinking of the risks and benefits of starting new medications based on individual circumstances and preferences.”

The study is the latest to challenge “treat-to-target” guidelines in medicine. Research concluding that risks outweighed benefits of drugs intended to achieve specific blood pressure goals in some patients prompted a significant change in hypertension guidelines last year and similar recommendations were implemented for lipid-lowering therapy.

International Federation for Diabetes guidelines for treating older people says the emphasis should be on managing complexity and quality of life issues – especially for frail elderly and those with dementia. “There is a need to individualize the medication regimen to balance the imperative to control disease states with the imperative to avoid/minimize medicine related adverse events. Medicines are associated with significant risks in older people such as falls, confusion and other cognitive changes, and admission to hospital or emergency departments could be avoided if medicines are managed optimally.”

Both Vijan and Hayward are members of the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation.

TAGGED:diabetes
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: Healthcare ethics-and-law training, shown through a coached clinical role-play where structured disc
Medical Ethics and the Law: The Training Behind Professionals Who Resolve Healthcare Disputes
Uncategorized
November 6, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The article connects routine occupational health screening with early exposure detection and better
What Routine Workplace Health Monitoring in Medical Environments Actually Prevents
Uncategorized
November 6, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The article contrasts structured prelicensure education with ongoing, practice-focused development f
Academic vs. Clinical Education: How Teaching Settings Shape Nursing Learners and Outcomes
Uncategorized
November 6, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: Health-editorial illustration of the two-way relationship between substance use and disrupted sleep,
How Sleep Disruption Feeds the Addiction Cycle and What You Can Do About It
Addiction Recovery Mental Health Wellness
November 6, 2026

You Might also Like

Could Orphan Drugs Turn Health Economics on its Ear?

November 22, 2011
Credit: Tim Gee
BusinessNewsPolicy & LawPublic Health

4 Ways Health Care Is Different from Other Industries

February 25, 2016
medical journals
News

Medical Journals Are Using AI Detectors to Avoid Publishing Bogus Studies

January 16, 2025

When Is External Peer Review The Right Choice For Hospitals?

October 20, 2015
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?