By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    headphones can create health problems
    The Harmful Health Effects of Using Headphones
    September 24, 2021
    Headache causes
    4 Causes Of Headache You Probably Didn’t Know About
    December 28, 2021
    follow these steps to recover from your injury
    What Steps Should You Take to Recover More Quickly from an Injury?
    April 12, 2022
    Latest News
    5 Steps to a Promising Career as a Healthcare Administrator
    August 3, 2025
    Why Custom Telemedicine Apps Outperform Off‑the‑Shelf Solutions
    July 20, 2025
    How Probate Planning Shapes the Future of Your Estate and Family Care
    July 17, 2025
    Beyond Nutrition: Everyday Foods That Support Whole-Body Health
    June 15, 2025
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Healthcare Breakthroughs: 3 Ways to Improve Your Chances of Fighting Obesity
    September 22, 2017
    Bone Marrow Donation and Compensation: My Moral Dilemma
    December 11, 2013
    health problems caused by poor cleanliness
    5 Serious Health Problems Caused By Poor Cleanliness
    September 15, 2020
    Latest News
    How IT and Marketing Teams Can Collaborate to Protect Patient Trust
    July 17, 2025
    How Health Choices and Legal Actions Intersect After an Injury
    July 17, 2025
    How communities and healthcare providers can address slip and fall injuries with legal awareness
    July 17, 2025
    Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
    July 6, 2025
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Lawyers and Medical Decision-Making
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > Lawyers and Medical Decision-Making
Business

Lawyers and Medical Decision-Making

gooznews
gooznews
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

We’ve heard a lot over the years about the inappropriate role of lawyers in the medical system. The complaints usually center  on trial lawyers who sue physicians for malpractice and drug companies for failure to warn consumers about unsafe drugs and devices. We’ve heard much less about lawyers who work for drug companies and try to game the regulatory system.

We’ve heard a lot over the years about the inappropriate role of lawyers in the medical system. The complaints usually center  on trial lawyers who sue physicians for malpractice and drug companies for failure to warn consumers about unsafe drugs and devices. We’ve heard much less about lawyers who work for drug companies and try to game the regulatory system.

This latter problem was in full display this afternoon at the FDA hearing on Roche/Genentech’s appeal of the FDA’s decision to remove breast cancer from Avastin’s label.  Paul Schmidt, a Covington & Burling attorney representing Genentech, repeatedly tried to pin down FDA oncology drugs chief Richard Pazdur and his colleagues as to whether they had ever specified that replicating the progression free survival benefit seen in the first trial that led to accelerated approval would satisfy the FDA and therefore lead to permanent approval.

Pazdur repeatedly replied that progression free survival was a surrogate marker of benefit and had to be accompanied by some other benefit, such as improved quality of life. Of course, a trial showing extended survival would be the best. But given the adverse events profile of Avastin — increased cardiovascular deaths; GI perforations; an increase in hypertension in a quarter of patients — any increase in time before a tumor began progressing as the sole benefit would have to be substantial before a drug would be approved based on that surrogate marker alone.

More Read

recruiting - recruitment - talent aquisition concept
5 Major Challenges in Healthcare Recruitment Today
Business Analytics for Radiology
Through the Murky Slog: Part II—A New Light for Cancer Therapies?
How Western Companies Can Capitalize on the Opportunities in India
Health IT Firm Secures $14M to Usher Payers, Administrators Into “Healthcare’s Retail Future”

“The approval process is not about a median progression free survival,” Pazur said. “It’s about a risk benefit analysis. The magnitude of a progression free survival change has to be viewed in the context of the safety profile of the drug, the disease setting, the existing therapies, and patient performance status. For me to give you an exact progression free survival would be impossible to do.”

Schmidt pressed ahead: “Did CDER say to Genentech that .8 months progression free survival (the amount seen in one of the follow-up trials) wouldn’t be enough to support approval?”

“I don’t believe we ever said that,” Pazdur said. “All we’re asking for here is one trial that shows clinical benefit.”

There has only been one new piece of clinical evidence introduced at this hearing. A phase II trial published in Lancet Oncology in April, where Avastin was added to several chemotherapy regimens, showed it slightly increased the time before the cancer resumes progressing by a few months — again! — and had no impact on the long-term mortality rate for women struck by a recurrence of this devastating disease.

So, there have been five follow-up trials, and not one has replicated the initial evidence that led to accelerated approval. Tomorrow, Genentech and its lawyers get to present their side of the story. If the company attempts to present new evidence, it will violate the ground rules set by the FDA for the hearing (not to mention normal legal procedures). Why do I think the real purpose of this hearing is to lay the groundwork for a lawsuit against the FDA?

TAGGED:AvastinFDAGenentechhealthcare businesshealthcare law
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

technology in medical research
The Tools Helping Medical Researchers See the Full Picture
News Technology
August 3, 2025
5 Steps to a Promising Career as a Healthcare Administrator
5 Steps to a Promising Career as a Healthcare Administrator
Health
July 31, 2025
holistic dental
Holistic Dentist Services Are Natural and Safe
Dental health Specialties
July 28, 2025
botox certification
Help Improve People’s Skin Health Via Botox Certification
Skin Specialties
July 22, 2025

You Might also Like

Rent a Grandma

October 19, 2011
healthcare marketing tips
Business

6 Critical Healthcare Marketing Tactics to Win Over New Patients

November 13, 2020
Image
BusinessFinanceHospital AdministrationNews

A More Positive Outlook on Provider Consolidation

March 16, 2013

Restrict Flexible Spending Accounts

March 9, 2011
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?