By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    improving patient experience
    6 Ways to Improve Patient Satisfaction Within Hospitals
    December 1, 2021
    degree for healthcare job
    What Are The Health Benefits Of Having A Degree?
    March 9, 2022
    custom software development is changing healthcare
    Digital Customer Journey Mapping and its Importance for Healthcare
    July 21, 2022
    Latest News
    Grounded Healing: A Natural Ally for Sustainable Healthcare Systems
    May 16, 2025
    Learn how to Renew your Medical Card in West Virginia
    May 16, 2025
    Choosing the Right Supplement Manufacturer for Your Brand
    May 1, 2025
    Engineering Temporary Hospitals for Extreme Weather
    April 24, 2025
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Can Thinking Younger Make You Live Longer?
    April 20, 2011
    Image
    Obesity’s Outlook Unchanged
    June 13, 2011
    When It’s An Emergency Elderly Not Treated As Well in Hospitals
    July 16, 2011
    Latest News
    Building Smarter Care Teams: Aligning Roles, Structure, and Clinical Expertise
    May 18, 2025
    The Critical Role of Healthcare in Personal Injury Recovery: A Comprehensive Guide for Victims
    May 14, 2025
    The Backbone of Successful Trials: Clinical Data Management
    April 28, 2025
    Advancing Your Healthcare Career through Education and Specialization
    April 16, 2025
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Left Behind: Will Cutting Medicare Hurt Seniors?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Left Behind: Will Cutting Medicare Hurt Seniors?
Policy & Law

Left Behind: Will Cutting Medicare Hurt Seniors?

Michael Millenson
Last updated: December 31, 2012 5:30 am
Michael Millenson
Share
7 Min Read
SHARE

 

 

First Posted at Forbes on 12/11/2012

Forget finances and the fiscal cliff: raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 is likely to kill some of those left behind ­– even if they already have private insurance. And cutting provider reimbursement too deeply? Ditto.

More Read

Telemedicine and the PCP Cliff
Making Sense of the Technical Difficulties in ObamaCare Implementation
The Elusive Power of mHealth
Narrow Networks in California?
What happens when an inmate goes to the hospital?

 

 

First Posted at Forbes on 12/11/2012

Forget finances and the fiscal cliff: raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 is likely to kill some of those left behind ­– even if they already have private insurance. And cutting provider reimbursement too deeply? Ditto.

Most of the criticism of a proposed two-year age hike has focused on the flawed fiscal rationale. But research evidence shows it’s not a matter of “your money or your life;” it’s a bad idea that hurts both.

The financial issues have been well-explored. We’d be dropping the actuarially healthiest group of seniors, with minimal savings, while putting the cost of caring for the remaining population onto a smaller group of sicker beneficiaries. At the same time, paying the medical expenses for the 65- to 67-year-olds who do become ill will fall either on private insurers or Medicaid. That’s shifting money, not saving it.

Meanwhile, those who don’t qualify for Medicaid or can’t afford private insurance will defer needed care. By the time they make it to the Medicare rolls, their cost of care could wipe out any budgetary savings.

The Incidental Economist blog recently highlighted evidence that raising the eligibility age has a regressive health impact; that is, poorer people will lose a greater percentage of their benefits, and it will adversely affect their life expectancy over time. But there is more direct evidence that “over time” could literally be the difference between the day before you’re covered by Medicare and the day you are, whatever your income level.

In an attempt to determine whether Medicare coverage truly saves lives (that’s actually been a hotly debate research question), a 2009 study in The Quarterly Journal of Economics looked at patients who showed up in the emergency room at California hospitals with problems needing immediate attention. In other words, they were unlikely to have ended up at the ER just because they got their Medicare card. The researchers divided the group between those just under age 65 and those 65 and older.

Those age 65 and over were a stunning 20 percent less likely to die within a week of admission those just under age 65. Moreover, the difference in death rates persisted for at least nine months. Importantly, the gap was too big to be explained by uninsured under-65s suddenly getting it.

The authors speculated that Medicare patients may have received more intense medical treatment. So much for the evils of government-run health care.

A 2011 study in the Annals of Internal Medicine indirectly buttresses that conclusion. Earlier, much-publicized Dartmouth research examined high-level differences in Medicare spending across different regions of the country and concluded that more medical spending had no relationship to better outcomes, This study, looking at more detailed individual patient data over a longer period of time, reached the opposite conclusion.

Within limits ­– since no one denies that expensive overuse and safetyproblems remain rampant in U.S. health care – more medical care both saved lives and reduced avoidable and costly hospital stays. Specifically, according toa separate study that appeared earlier this year, a 10 percent increase in medical care use was associated with an 8.4 percent decrease in the mortality rate and a 3.8 percent decrease in the rate of avoidable hospitalizations.

Given looming cuts in Medicare payments to providers, a little-noticed studyof the impact of payment cuts in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 is even more intriguing. The National Bureau of Economic Research paper, updated earlier this year, categorized hospitals by the degree of payment cuts (small, moderate, or large), then tracked actual patient outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries treated at these hospitals for heart attacks over an 11-year period.

Money mattered. After controlling for various factors, researchers found that the death rate from heart attacks for patients treated at hospitals facing large Medicare payment cuts jumped when compared to hospitals where reimbursement reductions were lower. Medicare accounts for about 40 percent of an average hospital’s total revenues, and the death rate difference was due in part to “reductions in staffing level and operating cost following the payment cuts.”

By way of perspective, the median age of current U.S. senators is 63 years old. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell turns 71 in February; Harry Reid turned 72 earlier this month. Vice President Joe Biden is 70. The average age of men who have a first heart attack is 66.

If blunt tactics like lowering the Medicare eligibility age or slashing provider reimbursement across the board aren’t the right way to control Medicare costs, then what is? What the Annals authors suggest will sound familiar to anyone paying attention to fundamental changes already underway in the health care delivery system. They (as do others) urge greater focus on providing more efficient care for each individual’s particular condition through physician use of comparative effectiveness research abetted by “organizational incentives” to reward providers of high-quality, cost-effective care.

In other words, what Medicare needs is accelerated implementation of initiatives such as the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Accountable Care Organizations that are the little-noticed backbone of theAffordable Care Act. The way to save Medicare? Obamacare.

The post Left Behind: Will Cutting Medicare Hurt Seniors? appeared first on The Doctor Weighs In.

TAGGED:Medicare
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Clinical Expertise
Building Smarter Care Teams: Aligning Roles, Structure, and Clinical Expertise
Health care
May 18, 2025
Grounded Healing: A Natural Ally for Sustainable Healthcare Systems
Grounded Healing: A Natural Ally for Sustainable Healthcare Systems
Health
May 15, 2025
Learn how to Renew your Medical Card in West Virginia
Learn how to Renew your Medical Card in West Virginia
Health
May 15, 2025
Dr. Klaus Rentrop Shares Acute Myocardial Infarction heart treatment
Dr. Klaus Rentrop Shares Acute Myocardial Infarction
Cardiology
May 13, 2025

You Might also Like

Public HealthWellness

Apple investors say iPhones cause teen depression. Science doesn’t

January 27, 2018

Supreme Court to Rule Thursday on Reform Law

June 25, 2012

Texas Rejects Medicaid Expansion

April 4, 2013
impact of pre-existing conditions on personal injury and its claims
Health care

The Impact of Pre-Existing Conditions on Personal Injury Claims

May 25, 2024
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?