By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    What Are the Benefits of CBD?
    November 27, 2021
    How to Measure Adult Diapers- The Ultimate Guide to Picking the Right Size
    March 8, 2022
    medicine cabinet
    The Effect Of Finished Dosage Form Manufacturing In New Drugs
    July 5, 2022
    Latest News
    3 Ways To Deal With Health Issues In Cities With High Pollution
    March 22, 2023
    What Tools Should Your Caregiver Have?
    March 22, 2023
    How to Combat Home Sickness After Moving Abroad
    March 19, 2023
    4 Ways to Recover from a Broken Hip
    March 14, 2023
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Time for some healthcare New Year’s resolutions
    December 17, 2015
    Can Big Data Analytics Make Telemedicine More Functional?
    February 5, 2021
    California Medical Board Under Fire For Failure to Discipline Doctors
    August 11, 2011
    Latest News
    What Are Bioidentical Hormones Made With?
    March 23, 2023
    Cover Medical Costs of Child Dog Bites with Legal Specialists
    March 23, 2023
    3 Ways to Improve the U.S. Healthcare System By 2030
    March 14, 2023
    6 Steps To Ensure Speed And Efficiency Of Clinical Studies
    March 14, 2023
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Molecular Diagnostics: Making the Uncertainties More Certain?
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Latest News
The Best Natural Sleep Remedies & Aids
The Best Natural Sleep Remedies & Aids
Wellness
Bioidentical Hormones
What Are Bioidentical Hormones Made With?
Medical Education
chemical peels for skin disorders
Chemical Peels Can Do Wonders for Treating Skin Disorders
Skin
health benefits of lip enhancements
Cleveland Clinic Cites Health Benefits of Lip Enhancements
lifestyle
child dog bite lawyer
Cover Medical Costs of Child Dog Bites with Legal Specialists
News
Aa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Aa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Technology > Molecular Diagnostics: Making the Uncertainties More Certain?
Technology

Molecular Diagnostics: Making the Uncertainties More Certain?

Marya Zilberberg
Last updated: 2012/07/01 at 9:12 AM
Marya Zilberberg
Share
11 Min Read
SHARE

Scott Hensley over at the NPR’s Shots blog posted a story about the recently approved molecular diagnostic test that can rapidly identify several gram-positive bacteria that cause blood stream infections.  This is indeed important, since conventional microbiologic techniques rely on bacterial growth, which can take up to 2 to 3 days. This is too long to wait to identify the bug that is the cause of a serious infection.

Scott Hensley over at the NPR’s Shots blog posted a story about the recently approved molecular diagnostic test that can rapidly identify several gram-positive bacteria that cause blood stream infections.  This is indeed important, since conventional microbiologic techniques rely on bacterial growth, which can take up to 2 to 3 days. This is too long to wait to identify the bug that is the cause of a serious infection. What doctors have done to date is make the best guess based on several factors, including the type of a patient, the source of the infection and the patterns of bacterial resistance at their site, to tailor empiric antibiotic coverage. The sicker the patient, the broader the coverage, until the culture results come back, when the doctor is meant to alter this treatment accordingly, either by narrowing or broadening the spectrum. The pitfalls of this work flow are obvious — too many points where error can enter the equation. So on the surface the new tests are a great advance. And they actually are, but they are not free of problems, and we need to be very explicit confronting them.

Each diagnostic test can be evaluated on its sensitivity (how well it identifies the problem when the problem exists), specificity (how rarely it identifies a problem when it does NOT exist), and positive (what proportion of all positive tests represents true problem) and negative (what proportion of all negative tests represents a true absence of problem). Sensitivity and specificity are intrinsic properties of the test and can be altered only by how the test is performed. Positive and negative predictive values are dependent not only on the test and how it is done, but also on the population that is getting tested.

Let’s take Nanosphere’s test in Scott’s story. If you troll the company’s web site, you will find that the sensitivity and specificity of this technology is close to 100%, if not 100%, the “gold standard” for comparison being conventional microbiology culture. And perhaps this is really the case in these very specialized hands that were testing the diagnostic. If these characteristics remain at 100%, disregard the rest of this post, please. However, the odds that they will remain at 100% in the wild of clinical practice are slim. But I am willing to give them 99% on each of these characteristics nevertheless.

More Read

emerging technology in healthcare

8 Advances in Medical Technology That Are Changing Everything

Using EHR systems in healthcare for Cost-Effective Services
Benefits of Emerging Technology in Healthcare in 2023
Healthcare SEO Tips to Grow Your Medical Practice
The Future Of Medicine: How Immunotherapy Is Saving Lives

OK, so now we have a near-perfect test that is available for anyone to use. Imagine that you are an ED doc at the beginning of your shift. An ambulance pulls up and rolls a septic patient into an empty bay. The astute ED nurses rush into settle the patient, and, as a part of the protocol, take a sample of blood for determining the pathogen that is making your patient sick. You quickly start the patient on broad spectrum antibiotics and walk away to take care of the next patient that has just rolled in with a heart attack. A few hours later, the septic patient, who is still in the ED because there are no ICU beds for him yet, is pretty stable, and you get the lab result back: he has MRSA sepsis. You pat yourself on the back because one of the antibiotics that you ordered was vancomycin, which should cover this bug quite adequately. You had also put him on ceftazidime to cover any potential gram-negative critters that may be lurking within as well. Now that you have the data, though, you can stop ceftaz and just continue vanc. The patient finally gets a bed upstairs, and your shift is over and you go home withe a sense of accomplishment.

The next morning you come in refreshed with your double-venti iced macchiato in your hand, sit at the computer and check on the septic patient. You are shocked to find out that last night he decompensated, went into shock and is now requiring breathing assistance and 3 vasopressors to maintain his blood pressure. You scratch your head wondering what happened. Then you come upon this crazy blog post that tells you.

Here is what happened. What you (and these tests) did not take into account is the likelihood of MRSA being the real problem rather than just a decoy false positive. Let’s run some numbers. The literature tells us that the likelihood of MRSA causing sepsis is on the order of 5%. Let’s create a 2×2 square to figure out what this means for the value of a positive test, shall we?

 
MRSA present
MRSA absent
Total
Test +
495
95
590
Test –
5
9405
9410
Total
500
9,500
10,000

What this says is the following. We have 10,000 patients roll into our ED with sepsis (in reality there are about 1/2 million to 1 million sepsis cases in the US annually), and we test them all with this great new test that has 99% sensitivity and 99% specificity. Of these 10,000, fifty are expected to have MRSA. Given this situation, we are likely to get 590 positive tests, of which 95, or 16%, will be false positive. Face-palm, you drop your head on the desk realizing that Mr. Sepsis from yesterday was probably one of these 16 per 100 false positives, and MRSA is probably not the cause of his infection.

You begin to wonder what if your lab really did not get the sensitivity and specificity of 99%, but more like 98%? Still pretty generous, but what if? You start writing madly on a napkin that you grabbed at Starbucks, and your jaw drops when you see your 2×2:

 
MRSA present
MRSA absent
Total
Test +
490
190
680
Test –
10
9310
9320
Total
500
9,500
10,000

Wow, you think, this false positive rate is now nearly 30% (190/680)! You can’t believe that you could be jeopardizing your patients’ lives 3 times out of 10 because you are under the mistaken impression that they have MRSA sepsis. This is unacceptable. But can you really trust yourself with these calculation? You have to do one more thing to convince yourself. What if your lab only gets 97% specificity and sensitivity? What then? You choke when you see the numbers:

 

 
MRSA present
MRSA absent
Total
Test +
485
285
770
Test –
15
9215
9230
Total
500
9,500
10,000

 

It’s and OMG moment — nearly 40% would be treated for MRSA when they potentially have something else.

But you, my dear reader, realize that in the real world docs are not that likely to remove gram-negative coverage if MRSA shows up as the culprit pathogen. Why should you think otherwise, when there is so much evidence that people are not that great about de-escalating antimicrobial coverage in response to culture data? But then I have to ask you what’s the use of this new test if no one will act on it anyway? In other words, how is it expected to help curb the rise of resistance? In fact, given the false positive MRSA rates we see above, might there not even be a paradoxical increase in the proliferation of resistance?

The point is this: We are about to see many new molecular diagnostic technologies on the market that have really really high sensitivity and specificity. The fly in this ointment, of course is the pre-test probability of the bug causing the problem. Look how in a very low risk group (5% MRSA) even a near-perfect test’s value of a positive is reduced by almost a ridiculous magnitude. Do feel free to check my math.

So you trudge into the hospital the next day for your shift and check on Mr. Sepsis one more time. Sure enough, his conventional blood culture grew out E. coli, a gram-negative bug. You notice that he is turning around, though, ceftazidime having been restarted by the astute intensivist (well, I am a bit biased here, of course). All is well in the world once again. Except you hear an ambulance pull up and the nurse talking on the phone to the EMTs — it’s another sepsis on your hands. What are you going to do now?
              

TAGGED: bacteria, molecular diagnostics

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Marya Zilberberg July 1, 2012
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article All About Genetic Counseling
Next Article Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) Impact on the Future Healthcare Workforce

Stay Connected

1.5k Followers Like
4.5k Followers Follow
2.8k Followers Pin
136k Subscribers Subscribe

Latest News

The Best Natural Sleep Remedies & Aids
The Best Natural Sleep Remedies & Aids
Wellness March 23, 2023
Bioidentical Hormones
What Are Bioidentical Hormones Made With?
Medical Education March 23, 2023
chemical peels for skin disorders
Chemical Peels Can Do Wonders for Treating Skin Disorders
Skin March 23, 2023
health benefits of lip enhancements
Cleveland Clinic Cites Health Benefits of Lip Enhancements
lifestyle March 23, 2023

You Might also Like

virtual reality in optometry
Technology

What Are the Implications of Virtual Reality in Optometry?

March 22, 2023
valueable healthcare programs
News

5 Most Valuable Healthcare Programs in 2023

March 8, 2023
how technology helping nursing patient care
Medicare

7 Ways Technology is Improving Nursing and Patient Care

March 8, 2023
AI in healthcare education
Artificial IntelligenceMedical EducationPolicy & LawTechnology

Colleges Prove the Huge Benefits of AI in Healthcare Education

February 21, 2023
//

We influence million of users and is the most authentic source of information on healthcare business and technology news.

Quick Links

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Follow US

© 2008-2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?