By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Panacea Dreamin’
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > Panacea Dreamin’
BusinessHealth Reform

Panacea Dreamin’

JohnCGoodman
JohnCGoodman
Share
5 Min Read
SHARE

When ObamaCare was being written into law, Congress was faced with a dilemma — “with all these newly insured people, how can we keep care affordable?” It came up with a magical solution — “We will create a brand new kind of organization to deliver care. One that will lower costs, increase access, and improve quality all at the same time! Never mind that such an organization doesn’t exist, we will pass a law requiring it to exist.” Access, cost, and quality have long been known as the three-legged stool of health reform. It is hard to improve one without worsening the others. So trade-offs must be made. But not this time. Congress decided it no longer had to make trade-offs. It could have its cake and eat it, too, by creating (drum roll)…tah daaaaah!…ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS (ACOs)!!!! This is like passing a law forbidding it to snow in the District of Columbia, since snow is such a chronic problem. It is messy, it is costly to remove, and it’s a danger to public health as people slip on the ice and hit their heads. It really should be banned. But only from DC, since so many Members of Congress enjoy skiing, and pictures of snowy small towns make for pretty Holiday (not Christmas) cards. Unfortunately, the little bit of evidence that exists is not much more encouraging than a law banning snow. An article by Trent Haywood and Keith Kossel in the New England Journal of Medicine notes:

With this rapid movement toward ACOs, one would expect that the previous government demonstration of the model would have produced promising results that warranted its rapid expansion. Our analysis of the results from the demonstration suggests otherwise.

They discuss a five-year demonstration project conducted by Medicare known as the “Physician Group Practice (PGP) Demonstration.” The program was confined to:

… a select group of large physician group practices with the necessary experience, infrastructure, and financial strength (participants invested $1.7 million, on average, in the first year alone) to succeed in the demonstration.

More Read

Questions about physician compensation methods? Check out BHM Healthcare Solutions and call today 1-888-831-1171
Physician Compensation 101: How Doctors Get Paid
Wanted: a GOP That’s Not Scared of Progress in Health Care
Ingredients of an Effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Be Sure to Add Health IT and Medical Device Innovation
ObamaCare and Tax Evasion
Medical Loss Ratio Reform: Barking Up the Wrong Tree

With those resources, this group should have had a “high likelihood” of positive results,” according to the authors. Instead, they did not even get their initial investment back. The authors conclude:

The high up-front investments make the model a poor fit for most physician group practices; the time frame in which one can expect a reasonable return on the initial investment is more than 5 years; and even the majority of large, experienced, integrated physician group practices could not recover their initial investment within the first 3 years.

Maybe that is why the regulators are having a devil of a time coming up with appropriate regulations. In AIS’ Health Reform Week Judy Packer Tursman reports that “after months of delay” the draft rules were expected some time in March. But the rest of the article is not hopeful as the draft rules bounce back and forth between CMS, OMB, FTC, DOJ, and many other agencies. Two CMS spokesmen are quoted as saying, “We don’t expect the reg out any time soon,” and “I don’t know when it is coming out. I can’t give you any idea.” Another unnamed source says, “They’re still struggling over big issues…. It’s a mess.” Of course, these ACOs are supposed to go into effect on January 1, 2012, and the regulations will have to be published for public comment for 60 days once the proposed regulations come out. And the prospect of a government shutdown adds to the confusion. Maybe Congress should have stuck to banishing snow.

TAGGED:ACOhealth care business
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

dental care
Importance of Good Dental Care for Health and Confidence
Dental health Specialties
October 2, 2025
AI in Healthcare
AI in Healthcare: Technology is Transforming the Global Landscape
Global Healthcare Policy & Law Technology
October 1, 2025
Choosing the Right Swimwear for Health and Safety
News
September 30, 2025
sports concussions
Concussion In Sports: How Common They Are And What You Need To Know
Infographics
September 28, 2025

You Might also Like

Hospitals Aim to Apply Direct Payments of Care Delivery to Increase Resources

August 28, 2012

Give Forward – a Social Solution for Out of Pocket Medical Care

August 28, 2011
obamacare
Health ReformPolicy & LawPublic Health

Tell Us Again Why We Need Young People

September 27, 2013
Image
BusinesseHealth

Healthcare Search Engine Optimization

May 12, 2013
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?