We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: What do Patients Really Want? Part II
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Public Health > What do Patients Really Want? Part II
Public Health

What do Patients Really Want? Part II

JosephKvedar
JosephKvedar
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

Today I’m following up to my last post, exploring the question of how and where the consumer perspective fits in the development of connected health.  Recently, I read with great interest a piece in JAMA called “What Patients Really Want From Health Care” by Allan Detsky.  It is a well-written and provocative piece. I don’t know Dr.

Today I’m following up to my last post, exploring the question of how and where the consumer perspective fits in the development of connected health.  Recently, I read with great interest a piece in JAMA called “What Patients Really Want From Health Care” by Allan Detsky.  It is a well-written and provocative piece. I don’t know Dr. Detsky but one gets the sense he must be a fine physician, in the tradition of Marcus Welby or the type of doctor I grew up with in Barre, Vermont, who would make house calls and always seemed to know how to make you feel better.

While interesting reading, to me, the piece seems flawed from two perspectives.  First, the article is highly focused on an acute care view.  Dr. Detsky notes that he practices in an inpatient setting and the piece reflects this bias.  Secondly, it is truly difficult to really know what patients want when you are in the role of the doctor.  I can fully say that when I take on the role of patient, I can’t really do so in a pure way, completely divorcing myself from my role as a doctor. I don’t think its possible for a physician to fully embrace the role of patient, possessing the insights into health and disease that years of clinician training and medical practice.  So, despite his best efforts, I don’t think that Dr. Detsky can tell us what patients really want.

It’s not that I think the JAMA article is off-point but rather incomplete.  There is so much more to health care than what goes on in the acute-care/inpatient setting. When we are sick enough to need an inpatient bed, most of us want to be cared for in the most profound way.  This perspective on care doesn’t translate well to the two other domains of health care that I routinely think about – namely health/wellness and chronic illness.

More Read

what is a certified nurse midwife
The Role of a Certified Nurse-Midwife [INFOGRAPHIC]
Telling Healthcare Stories via Multiple Media
Stopping the Revolving Door of Avoidable Readmissions [VIDEO]
The High Healthcare Costs of Emergency Department Visits: Stop Pointing Fingers and Begin Offering Solutions
Healthcare Progress Depends On “E Interventions”

Focusing on health/wellness and chronic illness, I’m going to risk falling into the same trap I’ve criticized Dr. Detsky for: I’m going to take a stab at what I think patients want. However, using the blog format for this communication allows me to take advantage of social media allowing for feedback, especially from those of you who are not doctors!  So, please help me with this.  If we hit a home run, the output from this dialogue will be fodder for our Symposium and for other writing projects I’m involved with.

In the realm of fitness and wellness, I believe:

  • We want to live forever in a healthy, painless state.
  • We want our health care professionals to take us seriously when we engage them in dialogue around alternative approaches to diet, exercise, nutrition, sleep and longevity.
  • We want integration of our fitness/wellness world into our healthcare world. Right now they are silos that don’t talk to each other.
  • We want to engage our healthcare professionals in conversations around all of the data we’re collecting about ourselves with consumer-level devices (and not have those data dismissed as unimportant).

In the realm of chronic illness:

  • We want low-friction solutions to help us cope.
  • We don’t want to be told we’re sick and we don’t want to be treated as sick.
  • We don’t want to face the future consequences of our chronic (often symptomless) illnesses.
  • We want to feel as if we can dig ourselves out of the chronic illness abyss – to feel hopeful.

In general:

  • We want good service.  A person to answer the phone.  A kind voice.  A caring and supportive person.
  • We want to be treated with respect.
  • We don’t want to spend time in the doctor’s office or hospital.
  • We want simple, consumer-friendly processes for accomplishing tasks like scheduling an appointment or refilling a prescription.
  • We want access to professional advice (Dr. Detsky and I align on this one).
  • We want transparency of process – ‘a play book on how to get things done.’
  • We want a way to take charge of coordinating our care without complex, repetitive and obtuse processes.

For centuries, patients have put up with tremendous inconvenience and friction to move themselves through the healthcare system.  They’ve put up with it because the only way to get care is to visit the doctor and the system is constructed to make the doctor’s work life as productive as possible, not to make it easy for patients.  I expect that to change in the coming years.  We’ll see more patient empowerment,  more instances where consumers can make their own health care decisions without  a physician and more opportunities to streamline care delivery making it simpler and more patient-friendly.

What do you think?  Did I get it right? What’s missing? Let me know.

 

TAGGED:patients
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: The article connects routine visual inspection and accurate barrier fit with protection of peristoma
Peristomal Skin Care: Healthy Skin, Irritation Causes, and When to See a WOC Nurse
Health Nursing
November 2, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: Clinical-trial operations editorial illustration combining healthcare and technology: country-specif
Clinical Study Operations Across Eastern European Research Markets
Health
October 31, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: A health-editorial scene of a first pain-management visit, bringing together attentive consultation,
What to Expect at Your First Pain Management Appointment
Therapies Wellness
October 29, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The core relationship is medication-only coverage versus coverage for a supervised clinical program.
Medical Weight Loss as a Workplace Benefit: The Questions I Would Want Asked
Weight Loss Wellness
October 29, 2026

You Might also Like

Image
Health ReformNewsPolicy & LawPublic HealthWellness

Should We Tax Fat?

June 1, 2012

Obesity Explained

December 2, 2011

Oral Health: How To Prepare For A Dental Emergency

March 16, 2020
URAC IRO Accreditation
BusinessFinanceHospital AdministrationMedical EthicsMedical RecordsPolicy & LawPublic HealthWellness

Why Outsourcing Your IRO Is a Good Idea

September 18, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?