We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: FDA Warning Letter: Don’t Make Unsubstantiated Claims, Even on Facebook
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > eHealth > Social Media > FDA Warning Letter: Don’t Make Unsubstantiated Claims, Even on Facebook
Policy & LawSocial Media

FDA Warning Letter: Don’t Make Unsubstantiated Claims, Even on Facebook

Eileen O'Brien
Eileen O'Brien
Share
4 Min Read
thumbs up
SHARE

thumbs upIn December 2012, the FDA sent a warning letter to Amarc Enterprises regarding two websites.

thumbs upIn December 2012, the FDA sent a warning letter to Amarc Enterprises regarding two websites. This letter has garnered attention because it references Facebook. The FDA details a variety of serious concerns over the way Amarc is marketing their vitamins, in particular their websites have numerous testimonials that are unsupported by clinical data.

For example, “PolyMVA helped save my life. I began a regimen of PolyMVA… After 3 months, the Stage 2 cancer was down to Stage 1.” These vitamins have not been approved by the FDA and are being improperly marketed as drugs. Similar claims were made for pets using the products and the FDA notes that this is also a violation.

Here is what the warning letter says about Facebook: “We also note claims made on your Facebook account accessible at: https://www.facebook.com/poly.mva, which includes a link to your website at www.polymva.com. The following are examples of the claims: In a March 10, 2011 post which was ‘liked’ by ‘Poly Mva’:

More Read

a person putting a bandage on a woman s head
How a car accident can leave hidden injury patterns
The Public Physician: @Doctor_V guest on #hcsmca
Kratom – a Solution for Opioid Addiction?
Scientists Look to TBHQ for Solution to Bird Flu
Carousel: Your New Weapon in Facebook Marketing
  • ‘PolyMVA has done wonders for me. I take it intravenously 2x a week and it has helped me tremendously. It enabled me to keep cancer at bay without the use of chemo and radiation… Thank you AMARC’”

The product’s Facebook page has been taken down, but it appears that the claim was posted to the wall. Not only was the claim left on the wall, it was “liked” by the page administrator which would be a clear endorsement of the claim. The letter also mentions a blog post on the Amarc site that makes claims that are unsupported by scientific data.

Interestingly, their other Facebook page is still live and posting things like this: “THE BINDING OF PALLADIUM, A RARE TRACE MINERAL, WITH ALPHA LIPOIC ACID, A POWERFUL ANTIOXIDANT, DRAMATICALLY INCREASES NUTRIENT ABSORPTION AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL AND THROUGHOUT THE BODY – A BREAKTHROUGH THAT DISTINGUISHES POLY-MVA® FROM ANY OTHER SUPPLEMENT!”

I posted a link to the FDA warning letter on their wall and asked for a response. They replied, “Discussions with the FDA are ongoing and the issues raised are being addressed. AMARC is committed to our products and working with health agencies in complying with any applicable rules and regulations. This is somewhat of a normal review in the industry. Thank you for the inquiry and we will continue to support our clients and our products.”

Follow existing guidelines
It’s clear that these websites, the Facebook page and blog provided no clinical data to support any of their claims. This warning letter isn’t really about Facebook or blogs, but about following existing guidelines. The FDA is very clear on labeling and how companies can promote their products. Companies that continue to follow this guidance (on websites, Facebook and blogs) should be fine.

What do you think about this letter?

Image courtesy of Owen W. Brown on Flickr (CC BY).

TAGGED:AmarcFDA
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

What Geographic and Specialty Variation Reveals About How Nursing Compensation Actually Works -- AI-generated illustration
What Geographic and Specialty Variation Reveals About How Nursing Compensation Actually Works
Career Nursing
August 27, 2026
Could Poor Ventilation Be Behind Your Afternoon Headaches?  -- AI-generated illustration
Could Poor Ventilation Be Behind Your Afternoon Headaches? 
Health
August 27, 2026
The Myth That Keeps People Stuck -- AI-generated illustration
The Myth That Keeps People Stuck
Addiction Recovery
August 25, 2026
What Hospitals Need to Know About EU MDR -- AI-generated illustration
What Hospitals Need to Know About EU MDR
Business Hospital Administration
August 18, 2026

You Might also Like

HIE and retirees
Health ReformPolicy & Law

Health Exchange Confusion: WSJ Style

September 11, 2013
future of nursing
Covid-19Health careHospital AdministrationNursingPublic Health

The Future Of Nursing In A Post-Pandemic World

August 29, 2020
Health carePolicy & Law

HIPAA Compliance: What Is It, Why Is It Important, And How To Simplify It?

July 23, 2020
BusinessNewsPublic HealthTechnology

CIN Special Report: Part II, Treatments Ready to Eradicate Pre-Cervical Cancer

May 2, 2012
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?