We use cookies, including third-party cookies from Google to serve personalized ads through AdSense, to operate this site and understand how it is used. By continuing to browse, you accept this use. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details, including how to opt out of personalized advertising.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Mayo Clinic, Duke Conducting Study Comparing FUS With Uterine Artery Embolization
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Technology > Medical Devices > Mayo Clinic, Duke Conducting Study Comparing FUS With Uterine Artery Embolization
Medical DevicesTechnology

Mayo Clinic, Duke Conducting Study Comparing FUS With Uterine Artery Embolization

EllenMcKenna
EllenMcKenna
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

Patient enrollment is underway for the first US-based study comparing MR-guided focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine fibroids. The study, called The Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow (FIRSTT) trial, is now open at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN and at Duke University in Durham, NC. Study participants will be randomly assigned for treatment with either FUS or UAE.

Patient enrollment is underway for the first US-based study comparing MR-guided focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine fibroids. The study, called The Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow (FIRSTT) trial, is now open at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN and at Duke University in Durham, NC. Study participants will be randomly assigned for treatment with either FUS or UAE.

Expected to provide important insights regarding the benefits and potential drawbacks of newer non-surgical treatment approaches for uterine fibroids, the study will follow patients for three years. Its goal is to assess how effective treatments are in symptom relief, side effects, impact on women’s quality of life, need for additional treatment, potential for future fertility and even the costs associated with each approach.

“Many women suffering from fibroids go to their local doctor and are offered hysterectomy to treat their fibroids, but are given no long-lasting alternatives to surgery,” says Elizabeth A. Stewart, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Mayo Clinic. “Both UAE and FUS are excellent less invasive options for women, but we have very little scientific evidence comparing these two approaches. The major goal of this important study is to generate information that will guide physicians and patients on the options that are right for them.”

More Read

mobile healthcare industry
Healthcare Industry Enters the Mobile World
How Technology Solutions Are Shaping The Future Of Home Healthcare
A Few Notes On Healthcare Software Development
Cleveland Clinic’s Picks for Top Innovations in 2014
Nick Marko and Geisinger’s Health Data Journey

The success of the FIRSTT trial depends on women participating in the research. The study seeks to enroll 220 women who can be treated at The Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota or Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. Complete information about the study and its eligibility requirements can be found here.

A Facebook group for women interested in the study has been established. Follow this link if you are interested.

TAGGED:clinical studyFUSUAE
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Flat editorial illustration: Healthcare ethics-and-law training, shown through a coached clinical role-play where structured disc
Medical Ethics and the Law: The Training Behind Professionals Who Resolve Healthcare Disputes
Uncategorized
November 6, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The article connects routine occupational health screening with early exposure detection and better
What Routine Workplace Health Monitoring in Medical Environments Actually Prevents
Uncategorized
November 6, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: The article contrasts structured prelicensure education with ongoing, practice-focused development f
Academic vs. Clinical Education: How Teaching Settings Shape Nursing Learners and Outcomes
Uncategorized
November 6, 2026
Flat editorial illustration: Health-editorial illustration of the two-way relationship between substance use and disrupted sleep,
How Sleep Disruption Feeds the Addiction Cycle and What You Can Do About It
Addiction Recovery Mental Health Wellness
November 6, 2026

You Might also Like

blockchain in healthcare
Technology

Blockchain Is Key to Making Healthcare More Secure

April 3, 2023
Medical InnovationsTechnology

Nanobots: The Bright Future of Surgical Robotics

July 24, 2018

What Keeps Top Healthcare CEOs Up at Night?

October 16, 2013
biopharma beat innovation and imagination
DiagnosticseHealthGlobal HealthcareMedical DevicesMedical EducationMedical EthicsMedical InnovationsMobile HealthPublic HealthWellness

BioPharma Beat: Imagination Is More Important Than Innovation

August 5, 2014
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?