By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Public Sector Health Benefits: Civil War II?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Public Sector Health Benefits: Civil War II?
Policy & Law

Public Sector Health Benefits: Civil War II?

DavidEWilliams
DavidEWilliams
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

As a kid learning about the US Civil War I remember being particularly moved by the fact that it divided a lot of families who had some members on one side and some on the other. It’s not as dramatic and isn’t violent, but the fight over public sector benefits, especially retirement health benefits, has some of the same characteristics. In Pension Issues Spice Dinner Debates the Wall Street Journal examines how those who enjoy generous government benefits are facing off against those who don’t. It would be a serious enough issue if it were simply a matter of jealousy, but those sounding the alarm are also upset that these obligations are sapping municipal and state finances.

“I don’t expect guarantees from my employer,” says Ms. Izzarelli, 50 years old, an internal auditor of private pension plans at a firm in White Plains, N.Y. “When they hit hard times, I wouldn’t expect them to carry a lot of benefits that they can’t afford. I don’t think public workers ever look at the world that way.” She didn’t have a receptive audience. Her two brothers are Connecticut state troopers, her father is a retired state trooper and her brother-in-law is a corrections officer… Ms. Izzarelli’s father, Sam Izzarelli, 72, says that as a taxpayer he understands his daughter’s point about the cost of benefits and pensions, but thinks the state has to “honor the contracts that they have made in the past to people like me.”

This is more than just an academic question. As the Massachusetts Taxpayer Foundation reported earlier this week in Retiree Health Care: The Brick That Broke Municipalities’ Backs:

The 50 largest cities and towns in Massachusetts face a crushing $20 billion liability for retiree health care benefits that threatens to wreak havoc with local government services.

The report shows that many communities would have to raise taxes by 50 percent or more just to pay for unfunded liabilities. I worry a lot that the benefits structure in my town harms services already and that the crush will make things much worse in the future. There’s no easy solution, but there are a few things that can be done:

  • Face up to the issue and make it clear just how serious a problem we are talking about. Kudos to the Massachusetts Taxpayer Foundation for doing some of that
  • Don’t cancel the health benefits, but pare them back to levels that are comparable to what the private sector provides. That means using modern managed care approaches that control costs without sacrificing quality
  • Reduce benefits for new hires
  • Substitute capital for labor, which will be easier to do once the full cost of a hiring a new employee is calculated

It’s true that governments have been foolish in how they’ve negotiated with public sector workers and haven’t been honest with the citizens about cost. And I understand why public sector employees and retirees think they deserve what they’re getting. In the business world, unsustainable labor agreements are sometimes resolved through bankruptcy or the threat of it. Better to deal with the issues now rather than getting to that scenario with municipalities and states.

More Read

Can America’s Youth be a Focal Point for Bending Healthcare’s Cost Curve?
How to Handle Hospital Malpractice Claims: Legal Steps to Take
The Doctor’s Not In. You’ll Have to See a Nurse.
CMS Proposed Payment Changes for Outpatient Procedures
There’s No Such Thing as Schizophrenia? Really?
TAGGED:medical economics
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5KFollowersLike
4.5KFollowersFollow
2.8KFollowersPin
136KSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

mri technology
Why Preventive MRI Maintenance Is Essential for Hospitals
Business Hospital Administration
July 24, 2026
senior on computer
Health and Digital Safety Risks Older Adults Should Know
Senior Care
July 24, 2026
The Riskiest Part of Getting Sick Isn't the Diagnosis. It's the Handoff
The Riskiest Part of Getting Sick Isn’t the Diagnosis. It’s the Handoff
Health
July 20, 2026
Patient Acquisition and digital-marketing
The Future of Patient Acquisition: Modern SEO & Digital Marketing for Dermatology Practices
Health Marketing Medical Innovations Technology
July 20, 2026

You Might also Like

White House’s Obamacare Support Tweet Attracts Haters

September 6, 2013

What Food Stamps Can Teach Us about Health Care

April 12, 2012
personal injury lawsuit defenses from personal trainers
Policy & Law

Common Defenses a Personal Trainer Can Raise Against You in a Lawsuit

June 7, 2021
blood cholesterol
CardiologyNewsPolicy & LawPublic HealthWellness

New Blood Cholesterol Guidelines

November 14, 2013
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2026 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?