By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    UV damage to eyes
    Warning Signs of Long-Term UV Damage to Your Eyes
    December 9, 2021
    degree for healthcare job
    The Ultimate Healthcare Recruiting and Staffing Guidebook
    March 21, 2022
    medicare part d benefits
    Everything that You Need to Know About Medicare Part D
    August 15, 2022
    Latest News
    Why Custom Telemedicine Apps Outperform Off‑the‑Shelf Solutions
    July 20, 2025
    How Probate Planning Shapes the Future of Your Estate and Family Care
    July 17, 2025
    Beyond Nutrition: Everyday Foods That Support Whole-Body Health
    June 15, 2025
    The Wide-Ranging Benefits of Magnesium Supplements
    June 11, 2025
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    Conference Season Approaching – Prepare for Landing
    August 8, 2012
    Are We Picking on VA Hospitals Too Much?
    June 8, 2014
    Medical Residents Get Their Own Social Network
    December 19, 2012
    Latest News
    How IT and Marketing Teams Can Collaborate to Protect Patient Trust
    July 17, 2025
    How Health Choices and Legal Actions Intersect After an Injury
    July 17, 2025
    How communities and healthcare providers can address slip and fall injuries with legal awareness
    July 17, 2025
    Let Your Lawyer Handle the Work Before You Pay Medical Costs
    July 6, 2025
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Lesser Known Legal Hurdles for Telemedicine
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > eHealth > Lesser Known Legal Hurdles for Telemedicine
eHealthPolicy & Law

Lesser Known Legal Hurdles for Telemedicine

rdowney14
rdowney14
Share
7 Min Read
SHARE

To say that medical practice law is fractured is an understatement.  So, it’s important for physicians to be familiar with their states’ Medical Practice Acts.

To say that medical practice law is fractured is an understatement.  So, it’s important for physicians to be familiar with their states’ Medical Practice Acts.

Even conscientious doctors who make an attempt to understand the laws governing the practice of medicine can make mistakes.  I know of one case in which a physician began doing Internet prescribing because he read the Medical Practice Act in his state and could not find in it a statement that said it was against the law.  For those of you who aren’t familiar with Internet prescribing, it’s illegal in all states with one exception; in order to prescribe prescription medication, most statutes do not mention the Internet, but do require a physical examination and a complete medical history to establish a doctor-patient relationship.  Rogue pharmacies often use questionnaires for the medical history part, but sidestep the requirement for an examination.  Medical boards have disciplined physicians caught doing Internet prescribing and in some extreme cases the doctors have lost their medical licenses.  More on the doctor-patient relationship in a moment.

Because there are legal pitfalls doctors should be aware of in telemedicine, Alexis Slagle Gilroy and Kristi V. Kung with the law firm of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP in Washington, D.C., have written an excellent article that describes some of the lesser known challenges.  In ”Telemedicine Legal Hurdles – An Overview of Lesser Known Challenges,” Gilroy and Kung first talk about the familiar legal topics – licensure and credentialing obligations.  Supervision of certain licensed and unlicensed personnel, requirements for establishment of a doctor-patient relationship, and the corporate practice of medicine are rarely addressed, but should be.

More Read

Tort Reform for Medical Malpractice System – Another Study Needed?
Direct-to-Consumer Advertising Still Influences Prescribing
The Revolutionary Advent Of Precision Medicine In Cancer Treatment
Repeal and Do What Exactly?
What Goes Into The Cost Of A CT Scanner?

The authors note that state medical boards are largely silent on the application of supervision requirements within telemedicine.  Why is this important?  Because doctors are supposed to supervise the performance of certain diagnostic tests.  And there are different supervision thresholds depending on the test and the lower-level healthcare provider. “General Supervision” means the physician has been involved in the overall direction and control, but his or her presence is not required.  “Direct Supervision”means the doctor has to be present and available if needed, but not in the room when the procedure takes place, while “Personal Supervision” means the physician is present in the room during the procedure.  Many Medical Practice Acts make these distinctions in describing the supervision of those lower-level providers involved.  Does the supervising physician’s presence by videoconference meet the “direct” or “personal” supervision levels?  Unfortunately, there is no pat answer because the laws vary from state to state.

Gilroy and Kung use Arizona and its unlicensed medical assistants in one example.  The supervision onus is on the physician.  A doctor must directly supervise a medical assistant, but can that be done via videoconferencing when the MA is on the patient end of the telemedicine visit? It depends on the Arizona Medical Board which licenses MDs and the Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners which handles DOs.  To date, I know of no such telemedicine complaint case filed with either board that would set a precedent one way or the other.  If needed, a board could formulate a new rule, or the State Legislature could update the statutes.  Here in Arizona, medical assistants are used everywhere, and ignorance is bliss.  Elsewhere, doctor supervision of licensed providers like nurses and physician assistants is not as specific.

For comparison purposes, Nevada requires its medical assistants to be supervised by physicians, but doesn’t define the supervision.

As mentioned above, the doctor-patient relationship is important when it comes to prescribing prescription medication.  Arizona and other states require an “in-person,” or face-to-face, physical exam first.  Some states have updated their Medical Practice Acts to allow the exam to be done via telemedicine, especially when the patient is in a prison or other institutional setting where it would be inconvenient for the patient to come to the doctor, and that makes sense.  Recently, Georgia’s medical board considered a proposed rule that would have required a patient to have a prior visit to a doctor before they could be seen telemedically by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant.  Thankfully, stakeholders argued successfully against it, and it has died a silent death.

Then there is the issue of the Corporate Practice of Medicine that Gilroy and Kung touch on.  Some states have corporate practice doctrines that make medical practices subject to corporate practice prohibitions pertaining to general corporations which are not permitted to practice medicine or to employ physicians.  Where these exist, there may be a legal way around them using a “friendly PC/MSO structure,” whatever that is.

Arizona does not have a limitation on who may own a physician practice.  So, there are non-physicians running companies and corporations, other than hospitals, that employ physicians in a medical practice.  What’s interesting is the non-physicians are beyond the jurisdiction of the Arizona Medical Board, but the physicians are not.  So, let’s say such a business decided that it didn’t want to follow state law and provide a patient’s medical records to a physician who left the medical practice and who was the patient’s doctor.  No legal requirement for the business, but the medical board could hold the physician responsible even though he had no access to the records after leaving the practice run by the non-physician.  Sounds crazy, but it almost happened here.

 

TAGGED:medical lawtelemedicine
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

holistic dental
Holistic Dentist Services Are Natural and Safe
Dental health Specialties
July 28, 2025
botox certification
Help Improve People’s Skin Health Via Botox Certification
Skin Specialties
July 22, 2025
Telemedicine Apps
Why Custom Telemedicine Apps Outperform Off‑the‑Shelf Solutions
Health
July 20, 2025
Grounded Healing: A Natural Ally for Sustainable Healthcare Systems
How IT and Marketing Teams Can Collaborate to Protect Patient Trust
Global Healthcare Policy & Law
July 17, 2025

You Might also Like

medicare part e
Health Reform

When Will Medicare Part E Transform Healthcare?

May 23, 2014

Insurer Has E-Security Problem

March 15, 2011
The Euro Health Consumer Index 2012
Global Healthcare

Euro Health Consumer Index 2012 Shows #Prevention is the Way Forward, of Course

May 23, 2012

Vitamin E Supplements May be Hazardous to Bone Health

April 3, 2012
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?