By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
    Health
    Healthcare organizations are operating on slimmer profit margins than ever. One report in August showed that they are even lower than the beginning of the…
    Show More
    Top News
    stress disorder
    5 Ways To Manage Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
    October 27, 2021
    Medical device classification and development strategies
    Medical device classification and development strategies
    January 19, 2022
    varicose veins
    Varicose Veins Prevention: 3 Lifestyle Changes to Make Right Now
    May 1, 2022
    Latest News
    6 Essential Strategies for Improving Your Medical Practice
    January 25, 2023
    Staying Positive While Living with Mesothelioma
    January 24, 2023
    The Many Health Benefits of Being Outdoors
    January 17, 2023
    How to Assess a Safe Placement of a Nasogastric or Nasoenteric Tube and Its Complications
    January 19, 2023
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
    Policy and Law
    Get the latest updates about Insurance policies and Laws in the Healthcare industry for different geographical locations.
    Show More
    Top News
    9 Great Resources For Your Medical Assistant Training
    August 16, 2018
    Waiting for HIPAA Clarity? Who Has Time?
    September 19, 2014
    Topics You Need To Study And Prepare For When Taking The NCLEX
    August 12, 2020
    Latest News
    Simplifying the Genetic Testing Process: How At-Home Kits are Changing the Game
    January 25, 2023
    9 Hospitals That Have Introduced Green Initiatives
    January 25, 2023
    Why a Health Retreat Can Be the Best Medicine
    January 12, 2023
    Best Money-Saving Tips for Health Managers
    January 12, 2023
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: The Supreme Court and the Subsidy in the Bathwater
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Latest News
ABA therapist
Everything You Need to Know About Applied Behavior Analysis
Health
Small Lifestyle Changes That Can Have A Big Impact On Your Well-Being
lifestyle Wellness
The Future Of Medicine: How Immunotherapy Is Saving Lives
The Future Of Medicine: How Immunotherapy Is Saving Lives
Technology
medical practice and technology advancement
6 Essential Strategies for Improving Your Medical Practice
Technology
digital dental x-ray
How Does A Digital Dental X-Ray Work?
Dental health
Aa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Aa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Policy & Law > Health Reform > The Supreme Court and the Subsidy in the Bathwater
BusinessHealth ReformPolicy & Law

The Supreme Court and the Subsidy in the Bathwater

Brad Wright
Last updated: 2015/03/05 at 9:00 AM
Brad Wright
Share
7 Min Read
supreme court and the ACA
SHARE

supreme court and the ACA

supreme court and the ACA

“Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater”: this saying actually originates–at least anecdotally–from the process of families sharing a single bathtub full of water. Starting with the head of the household and working their way down, the end of the process saw the baby bathed last, in what was by that point some pretty foul water. Whether or not there’s any truth to that origin story, the saying persists to this day, and it’s a great metaphor for examining the King v. Burwell case being heard by the Supreme Court today. At issue, primarily, is whether or not it is legal for the federal government to provide health insurance subsidies to individuals who purchase a plan through a federal–rather than a state-run–exchange. The government says of course it is. The plaintiffs say it is not. For a deeper dive into the issue, I would recommend that you read this piece from Kaiser Health News and this piece from the Washington Post.

What happens if the Court sides with the Plaintiffs, making federal health insurance subsidies illegal? Well, barring any corrective action on the part of Congress, the White House, and/or the many states with federally-run exchanges, the results are rather bleak: On average, the price of health insurance premiums would increase by 255% nationwide. In Mississippi, the premiums could increase a staggering 779%. Directly affected by these spikes in prices would be the approximately 8 million people, spread over 37 states, who would no longer be allowed to receive federal subsidies to help them purchase their coverage at a more affordable rate. If and when such alarming rate increases occur, health insurance would be considered “unaffordable” for those individuals, meaning they could drop coverage without having to pay a penalty for being uninsured. In fact, the only people who would dare to pay such high rates to keep their coverage would be those who are extremely sick. This, of course, shifts the math calculation that goes into determining the cost of insurance (that is, the risk pool determines premium rate setting), and pretty soon the insurance markets in those states would be on a course to complete collapse. From that standpoint, if what the Republicans want to do is precipitate the perfect conditions for a single payer system, they should continue to hope that the Court strikes down the subsidies. The problem is that real lives would be affected.

More Read

cybersecurity options for hospitals

Should Hospitals Use SASE or Traditional Network Security?

6 Tips for Getting Into Medical School
The Technology and Services You Need to Open Your Own Counseling Office
Do You Need Life Insurance? What Does It Cover?
5 Ways New Technology is Revolutionizing Health

Meanwhile, the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services say there basically is no plan B. That’s their official position, but it’s not likely to be true. You see, they don’t want to act like the plaintiff’s position has any merit, and coming out with a backup plan would suggest that the Obama Administration at least considers it a possibility. But they’re not stupid. Of course they’re working on a contingency plan behind the scenes, and it looks like the plan is already being circulated internally. For more, and a particularly interesting audio interview, click here. Others, however, are also suggesting that the GOP has its own plan B in place.

But what about that subsidy in the bathwater? What am I talking about? Well, it’s precisely this: There are a lot of people who probably hope that the Supreme Court finds for the plaintiffs and that federal subsidies become illegal outside of state-run health insurance exchanges. In fact, many of these people probably hope for such a decision because they’re optimistic that it might precipitate the collapse not only of some states’ health insurance markets, but also the entire Affordable Care Act to which they’re so opposed. You see, they see this law–this ObamaCare–as symbolic of a lot of things they dislike. They think it gives handouts to the lazy who refuse to work, while tightening the financial screws on the honest, hard-working American who’s just trying to put food on the table. Or, they think that it means the government is going to get its hands all over the Medicare program and harm seniors’ health benefits in the process. To these people, ObamaCare is dirty bathwater, and they hope that the Court turns the tub over and dumps the whole thing out, just because there’s a baby in there.

But what about the baby in that bathwater? The subsidy? You see, people like to point their fingers at others–those who are perhaps not like themselves–and say that they don’t “deserve” a subsidy. They think such subsidies are not babies, but merely more dirty bathwater to be done away with. Yet, if you are one of the 158 million Americans who gets health insurance through your employer, guess what? The federal government is subsidizing your insurance by not taxing it. And to the tens of millions of Americans with Medicare, guess what? The federal government is subsidizing your insurance. Yet, when asked, some 93% of Americans age 65 and over (Medicare recipients) said they did not receive subsidized health insurance (read page 41 of this report for the data).

It’s convenient, isn’t it, to pass judgment on something that will adversely affect a whole group of people from enjoying a government benefit that you yourself are quite likely to enjoy if you a) have a job and/or b) live long enough, just because you’ve convinced yourself that you’re not receiving a handout and/or those other people don’t deserve a handout because they are different than you. In all of this, I can see only two equitable solutions: Either everyone in need must be able to receive a federal subsidy to purchase health insurance, or all the rest of us who have been ignorantly and blissfully enjoying our subsidies need to kiss our babies goodbye.

Supreme Court / shutterstock

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Brad Wright March 5, 2015
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article Google tonsillectomy Google’s Knowledge Graph: Four Things You Need to Know
Next Article state power and the ACA Giving Power to the States, But at Whose Expense?

Stay Connected

1.5k Followers Like
4.5k Followers Follow
2.8k Followers Pin
136k Subscribers Subscribe

Latest News

ABA therapist
Everything You Need to Know About Applied Behavior Analysis
Health January 26, 2023
Small Lifestyle Changes That Can Have A Big Impact On Your Well-Being
lifestyle Wellness January 26, 2023
The Future Of Medicine: How Immunotherapy Is Saving Lives
The Future Of Medicine: How Immunotherapy Is Saving Lives
Technology January 26, 2023
medical practice and technology advancement
6 Essential Strategies for Improving Your Medical Practice
Technology January 25, 2023

You Might also Like

at-home genetic testing method kits
Global Healthcare

Simplifying the Genetic Testing Process: How At-Home Kits are Changing the Game

January 25, 2023
green hospitals
Hospital Administration

9 Hospitals That Have Introduced Green Initiatives

January 20, 2023
benefits of going on a health retreat
Global HealthcareHealth

Why a Health Retreat Can Be the Best Medicine

January 12, 2023
saving money in healthcare
BusinessGlobal HealthcareHospital Administration

Best Money-Saving Tips for Health Managers

January 12, 2023
Follow US

© 2008-2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?