By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
  • Health
    • Mental Health
  • Policy and Law
    • Global Healthcare
    • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Innovations
  • News
  • Wellness
  • Tech
Search
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Eeny Meeny Miney Money: Understanding Fee-for-Service Alternatives
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Health Works CollectiveHealth Works Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
© 2023 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Health Works Collective > Business > Finance > Eeny Meeny Miney Money: Understanding Fee-for-Service Alternatives
BusinessFinanceHospital Administration

Eeny Meeny Miney Money: Understanding Fee-for-Service Alternatives

Abby Norman
Abby Norman
Share
6 Min Read
Value Based Purchasing
SHARE

Value Based PurchasingWhen we look at the fee-for-service model from only one perspective, it’s easy to condemn it as “the reason” healthcare spending has spiraled out of control.

Value Based PurchasingWhen we look at the fee-for-service model from only one perspective, it’s easy to condemn it as “the reason” healthcare spending has spiraled out of control. When it comes to how providers bill for services, having the ability to bill for anything and everything could, and certainly did, encourage the ordering of too many tests and procedures, even unnecessary ones. The idea of value-based payment models not only encourages providers to make more mindful choices, but cost-effective ones too. It also challenges healthcare systems, pharmaceutical companies and patients to be even more vigilant about healthcare costs. Fees are relative to each party involved. 

For payers, the idea of ‘fee-for-service’ isn’t inherently a bad one. Fee-for-service and quality don’t have to be mutually exclusive. When payers second guess claims, or refuse to pay them, the motivation isn’t necessarily linked to the quality of the care provided. Often, it’s a matter of cost efficiency: maybe the care was stellar, but did it need be so expensive? Could that quality of care been achieved for less money?

In terms of getting healthcare back on track financially, these are actually important questions to be asking. And by asking these questions, healthcare innovators become motivated to find new ways to get maximum quality for minimum cost. When it comes to government insurance, the drive to achieve maximum quality for minimum cost is meant to lessen the financial burden of taxpayers.

More Read

How Staffing Agencies are Helping Healthcare Professionals Land their Dream Jobs
Do Overworked Medical Interns Cause Medical Errors? Let’s Sleep on It.
Unnecessary Regulations that Increase Prescription Drug Costs
Blue Button Download of Personal Health Data to be Expanded to Federal Employees and Their Families
Culture of Disrespect in Medicine Affects Patient Safety

From the provider’s perspective, it probably doesn’t seem reasonable to expect every patient with the same condition will have the same healthcare needs and, therefore, costs. In the short view, this might be true. But if payers are looking at averages across longer periods of time, and looking at data collected from multiple sources to see if, indeed, there are similarities among certain patient demographics that can be quantified. By quantifying them, and backing it up with supporting data, payers can create a picture of patient populations that can be assigned a cost value.

The consistency of this analysis and the results isn’t a perfect science, though. But the point behind it, for payers, is creating a somewhat predictable model so that regardless of where the patient receives treatment, whichever provider, the quality and cost is equivalent.

So too, then, must payers be confronted with the reality of fraud and abuse. In any payment system, individuals determined to do so will “work” the system to their advantage, even if that means fraud. However, in some cases, the system is set up in such a way that it lends itself to being vulnerable to abuse. Fee-for-Service models are, inherently, vulnerable if they are not paired with careful measures of tracking, review and an overall atmosphere of accountability.

The trap that providers and payers can fall into is forgetting the end-all, be-all of policy changes and decision making around payment models: the interest of the patient.

Fee-for-Service goes back to World War II, when the concept emerged simultaneously with the first round of managed care. Keeping that in mind, it’s probably one reason it’s been so hard to shake. During WWII, when employers were short-handed, what with so many men overseas, one way to entice people to work for them was by offering health benefits. We still practice this, but, as more people rejoined and joined the workforce, the benefits plans needed to become competitive. So, prices went up – and managed care didn’t fare well in the following decades.

Then, with the introduction of Accountable Care, the underlying motif of managed care resurfaced – and appeared to be a decent solution to the overwhelming cost control issues that plague healthcare after years of practice-and malpractice-of the fee-for-service model.

For payers, though, it’s not a simple ‘and/or’ – there are actually several other fee-for-service alternatives out there, some of which are quite different from the previous, sole alternative of managed care. Bundled payments, shared savings and partial capitation provide healthcare organizations and payers more options than ever before in terms of how they handle cost.

Moving away from fee-for-service is essential to creating a sustainable healthcare system in the U.S., but the alternative that will be widely utilized has yet to emerge in a majority.

Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
Share
By Abby Norman
My name is Abby Norman and I am a healthcare blogger. With over 10 years of experience in the medical field, I have developed a passion for helping others understand the complexities of healthcare.

Stay Connected

1.5kFollowersLike
4.5kFollowersFollow
2.8kFollowersPin
136kSubscribersSubscribe

Latest News

Traumatic Brain Injuries
Understanding Traumatic Brain Injuries: What Families Need to Know
Policy & Law
October 10, 2025
Remote Monitoring touchpoints
Remote Monitoring Touchpoints Patients Will Actually Follow
Technology
October 9, 2025
dental care
Importance of Good Dental Care for Health and Confidence
Dental health Specialties
October 2, 2025
AI in Healthcare
AI in Healthcare: Technology is Transforming the Global Landscape
Global Healthcare Policy & Law Technology
October 1, 2025

You Might also Like

BusinesseHealthMarketingMedical InnovationsMobile Health

Why Dental Offices Need a Custom Mobile Application?

February 6, 2018

Difficult Patients and Unnecessary Catheters. Could They be Related?

September 15, 2011

The Absolute Case for Relative Value Units

November 25, 2013
storytelling
BusinessHospital Administration

Pixar’s Magic: Storytelling is a Doctor’s Strongest Medicine

April 12, 2016
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Follow US
© 2008-2025 HealthWorks Collective. All Rights Reserved.
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?